User talk:Wysiwyg3006

Welcome!
Wysiwyg3006,

After reviewing your additions to the Michael Pitts page, it seems that you are very determined to attach as much negative information as possible. My recent additions were made after hours of research on the matter, and carry as many references as are available. I made them to add a neutral point of view.

Warring is never acceptable on Wikipedia, and I believe your additions and editions are bordering this. To date, you have not had any input that was not inclusive of negative media, nor in any section other than "Scandals" or "Controversy". — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThePianoMan76 (talk • contribs) 23:35, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your thoughts. Your words "only" and "many" seem intentionally misleading, are entirely relative, and have been removed. Also, you seem to have no order to the events listed. I have corrected them in chronological order for you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThePianoMan76 (talk • contribs) 04:15, 15 July 2014 (UTC)