User talk:Wythenshawshank

..

Your only warning
"go boil your head, you crabby old fuckwit".

Repeat that and I will seek to have you blocked until you calm down. Eric  Corbett  19:54, 17 March 2016 (UTC)


 * "Piss off, you cantankerous evil old shit pot". If the council had any money it certainly wouldn't spend it on the likes of you, you cretinous old numpty. Wythenshawshank (talk) 19:56, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Despite policy, Eric, you lost the standing to complain about other people's swearing a long time ago. You're also at 7RR yourself. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:20, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * does that make it acceptable for someone to be abused so disgustingly?  Cassianto Talk   21:46, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * It doesn't, because we wisely have a policy that no editor gets to act like that to any other editor.
 * But that said, I (and I suspect many others) have zero sympathy for any complaints by Eric about this. He's burned that bridge a long time ago. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:57, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * So that's the full extent of your position? You don't like me, so there's no need to be civil to me? Don't you find that at that the least hypocritical, if not corrupt? No need to reply, I won't be reading it anyway. Eric   Corbett  22:14, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * How did you guess I was a woman, Eric? You fucking tard. Wythenshawshank (talk) 09:05, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Well I have no sympathy at all for Eric...he just isn't likeable at all 78.151.27.61 (talk) 23:31, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Also, while we're on the subject, do not do this again. Stick to content, not contributors.  Cassianto Talk   21:39, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Take a hike you mong. Wythenshawshank (talk) 09:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest editing
Hi. You might want to read WP:COI (re a possible conflict of interest) and WP:CONSENSUS (re your insistence on adding text to an article despite clear opposition on the talk page). Best wishes. --regentspark (comment) 22:01, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Just because the City Council is short of money, you can't blame me.Wythenshawshank (talk) 09:03, 21 March 2016 (UTC)