User talk:Wzwz

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:


 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type &#126;&#126;&#126; (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (4 tildes).
 * Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
 * Follow the Simplified Ruleset
 * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * Remember Neutral point of view
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Hello Meelar, thanks for the welcome. best regards, wolfgang = Wzwz 19:10, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Mathematical notation
Hello. Your edits to birthday paradox prompt some tips: There's no reason to use an asterisk for multiplication; you can write


 * 2n + 3

or


 * 2 &times; n (not to be confused with) 2 x n, in which the letter x is used instead of &times;; there's no need for that.

You can write, for example, things like


 * cos2(x) + sin2(x).

Notice that the variable x is italicized by sin and cos are not, in both respects matching TeX style. And there are spaces on both sides of "+"; such spacing is unnecessary in TeX since TeX handles such things automatically, but in this non-TeX notation it prevents clutter and aids legibility. Michael Hardy 23:34, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

--

Hi Michael, thanks for the correction of the article and the hints. I wanted to use the "math-tag" "on the fly", but last time I used TeX syntax must have been months ago, so I failed and wrote the formulas in plain text. Best regards, Wolfgang - Wzwz 21:26, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

p.s.: And thanks for replacing "i" with "n". I saw the error some minutes ago, reading the downloaded version from yesterday and I just wanted to correct it. Reason of error: "i" is the variable of the javascript which was used for table and pictures [ :-( ].

more ...
Hello. Your recent editing inspires some further observations:

There is no need to write a >= b.

You can write a ≥ b instead.

There is no need to write c[i] if you mean ci.

There is no need to use the br character in the ways in which you've used it.

Please see my editing of cycles and fixed points. Michael Hardy 22:42, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

Hi Michael,

≥ ? Very surprising, earlier I've tested &amp;ge; = ≥ in a local file with some browsers, there was no success with Netscape 4.75 Same result: &amp;#8805; = ≥ / &amp;asymp;= ≈ / &amp;#8776; = ≈ The downloaded wikipedia-page "cycles and fixed points" is shown correct, I assume this is caused by the use of "charset=utf-8".

Best regards, Wolfgang Wzwz 22:18, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Just one more test: also this edit is viewed correct in N4.7 Wzwz 22:22, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:050712_perm_0.png
Hi, you uploaded the above file... On it's description page it says public domain and then it says copyrighted... Please fix the tags on the description page, thanks. Zcrayfish

The same problem is on Image:050712_perm_1.png, Image:050712_perm_2.png, and Image:050712_perm_3.png. You also uploaded them. Zcrayfish 07:13, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

pd PD-release both has the same meaning for me, I' m no lawer: Images are made by me and i don't claim any restrictions. Wzwz 17:23, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Your changes to States of Germany articles
I've noticed you've been bold and added sections concerning the most recent elections to several States of Germany articles, like North Rhine Westphalia or Bavaria. However, before you do work that has already been done before, I'm kindly suggesting to you to use the material you can find at Elections in Germany as it conforms better to the Wikipedia Manual Of Style than the tables you have written. I've brought your edits in line with the MoS. Thank you and happy editing. --Doco 18:27, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Free use images Category?
I notice this page is in the Free use images category. You might want to put &lt;nowiki> tags around the copyright template. -Freekee 03:33, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:060416 anha.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:060416 anha.png, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Also listed are:
 * Image:060416 bawu.png
 * Image:060416 berl.png
 * Image:060416 bfs .png
 * Image:060416 brem.png
 * Image:060416 hamb.png
 * Image:060416 hess.png
 * Image:060416 mbvb.png
 * Image:060416 mbvp.png
 * Image:060416 nisa.png
 * Image:060416 nrw .png
 * Image:060416 rhpf.png
 * Image:060416 saar.png
 * Image:060416 sacs.png
 * Image:060416 slho.png
 * Image:060416 thue.png

&mdash; Wwagner 01:40, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Please edit images for Extended_Boot_Record
Your two images: Image:06-02-05-embr-entry-1.png and: Image:06-02-05-embr-entry-2.png

though greatly adding to the understanding of this topic, have a technical problem in that the term "EMBR" should not have been used. Could you please edit that term to display: "EBR" instead on your images and re-upload them? Once you do, we can remove the note pointing out this error from the page ;-). Daniel B. Sedory 09:57, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Just wanted to let you know that I've already edited the images, but will have to alter them again; see next entry! Daniel B. Sedory 20:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Would like to know where your information came from?
Wolfgang, can you please tell me where your 'rules' for computing data in the Extended_Boot_Record partition tables came from? I'd like to know, because the statements made about a Second entry's Number of Sectors are, unfortunately, incorrect when compared with real EBR partition tables. I'll be changing the article in light of the data I submitted under the Discussion page for the article; would appreciate some comments from you about this. Daniel B. Sedory 21:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:06-01-05-embr-entry-1.png
A tag has been placed on Image:06-01-05-embr-entry-1.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. rootology ( C )( T ) 17:08, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:06-01-05-embr-entry-2.png
A tag has been placed on Image:06-01-05-embr-entry-2.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. rootology ( C )( T ) 19:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:06-02-05-EMBR-B.png
Thanks for uploading File:06-02-05-EMBR-B.png I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 00:37, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

answer
- the uploaded file was created entirely by myself - the image was never published before - have a look to: home.arcor.de/wzwz.de/wiki/bilder/06-02-05-EMBR-Images.zip Wzwz (talk) 20:00, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:050712 perm 0.png
File:050712 perm 0.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:050712 perm 0.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 03:27, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:User-wzwz-100804-fh-hn.png
 Thanks for uploading File:User-wzwz-100804-fh-hn.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 02:29, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Verkehrsgewerkschaft GDBA


A tag has been placed on Verkehrsgewerkschaft GDBA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 14:27, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

IndustriAll European Trade Union
Hello,, and thank you for your contributions!

Some text in an article that you worked on IndustriAll European Trade Union, appears to be directly copied from another Wikipedia article, IndustriAll - European Trade Union. Please take a minute to double-check that you've properly attributed the source text in your edit summary.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on IndustriAll European Trade Union at any time. MadmanBot (talk) 14:26, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Yes, "IndustriAll European Trade Union" shoud have been a "RENAME" of "IndustriAll - European Trade Union" followed by a request of delete for the old name. I'll stop my work for today, maybe I'll correkt my false tomorrow ( Iff no other one did it before,  including the links inside   "European Metalworkers' Federation"   and   "IndustriALL Global Union"   :-)                        ) Wzwz (talk) 14:40, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of IndustriAll European Trade Union
Hello Wzwz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged IndustriAll European Trade Union for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Longbyte1 (talk) 16:13, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I did not do the deletions, but changed them to redirects. What you were apparently trying to do is to enter the same article under the various forms of the name. That's not the way we do it: we make WP:REDIRECT pages under the non-preferred forms. Take a look at he pages to see how it works.  DGG ( talk ) 17:31, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MDAX, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TAG (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:19, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)