User talk:X!/Archives/9/2011

The Signpost: 05 September 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:07, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/rfap/index.php?name=USERNAME&rfa=on
Just thought  I'd let you  know that  the RfA voters! vote counter is now completely broken after not  working  from the X!-tools navigation menu. Are you intending  to  fix this or shall we find another user with  a toolserver account to rewrite a tool for this? --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:01, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:21, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 September 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:55, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to New Orleans developers' meeting
Sumanah (talk) 06:16, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Range contributions tool not working
Do you know why http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/rangecontribs/index.php is not working? It's a real problem, as I found the tool indispensable for checking whether a range block was suitable, and if so for how long. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:01, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Been having the same problems for the past couple of days and have been stuck with the tool here. Hopefully you can get it all sort out. Elockid  ( Talk ) 21:58, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey. I just noticed that the rangecontribs tool is broken. Any idea what's going on? —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:49, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I came here for the same reason! Very useful tool, that. It would be a shame to lose it. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   17:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * He hasn't been on since 26 August --Guerillero &#124; My Talk  17:56, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * No, but both I and Elockid mentioned this on that date, before X!'s last edits. Thanks, X!, for the tool, which really was extremely useful. I do hope it can be restored to active service. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:32, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I have a toolserver account and am interested in rebuilding the tool. Can anybody explain (to the best of their knowledge) what X!'s tool's functionality was? Was it just to display the contributions by a range, or where there other special features? —  Kudu ~I/O~ 13:14, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * It displayed the contributions by IPs in a given range in one list in chronological order. I think it also calculated the range if you put a list of IPs in, but there's another tool on the Toolserver that does that. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   13:47, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Yup. Just type in the range, or a list of IPs (the tool will autocalculate the range), the number of results you want to show per page and it will show you the contributions from the range from the most recent to the latest contributions. Elockid  ( Talk ) 15:34, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I didn't know you could do it with a list of IP addresses, but if you used, for example, the URL http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/rangecontribs/index.php?type=range&ips=188.23.0.0/16&limit=50 then it would give a list of the last 50 edits from IPs in the given range. You could then click on a link to get the previous 50, and so on. If someone can rebuild it then they will earn my undying gratitude. It is a real nuisance being without it. If there has been a lot of disruptive editing from an editor in a range it is, in my opinion, essential to be able to check whether there have also been constructive edits from other editors before deciding whether to impose a range block. I hate having make that decision in the dark. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:58, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

For the people still following this thread, I've spent the past few days cobbling together a script to do what the rangecontribs tool did. I think it works, but I need you guys to test it a bit. If you want it's up at http://toolserver.org/~helloannyong/range/ and you can report any issues with it to me. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:51, 17 September 2011 (UTC)


 * It looks pretty good to me. There may be times when the 30 limit could be unhelpful, but it is certainly very useful in its present form. In testing it I have occasionally got a "bad gateway" error, but if I tried once or twice more it worked OK. Anyway, my guess is that it's a toolserver problem, rather than a problem with your script, in which case there's probably nothing you can do about it. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:35, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:43nuqugwso9a.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:43nuqugwso9a.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Inks.LWC (talk) 04:49, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 September 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 10:57, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Research into the user pages of Wikipedians: Invitation to participate
Greetings,

My name is John-Paul and I am a student with the University of Alberta specializing in Communications and Technology.

I would like to include your Wikipedia user page in a study I am doing about how people present themselves online. I am interested in whether people see themselves in different ways, online and offline. One of the things I am looking at is how contributors to Wikipedia present themselves to each other through their user pages. Would you consider letting me include your user page in my study?

With your consent, I will read and analyze your user page, and ask you five short questions about it that will take about ten to fifteen minutes to answer. I am looking at about twenty user pages belonging to twenty different people. I will be looking at all user pages together, looking for common threads in the way people introduce themselves to other Wikipedians.

I hope that my research will help answer questions about how people collaborate, work together, and share knowledge. If you are open to participating in this study, please reply to this message, on your User Talk page or on mine. I will provide you with a complete description of my research, which you can use to decide if you want to participate.

Thank-you,

John-Paul Mcvea

University of Alberta

jmcvea@ualberta.ca

Johnpaulmcvea (talk) 20:50, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ampallang piercing penis.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Ampallang piercing penis.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:23, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:52, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:47, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Re: SoxBot III
Hello. I was looking at one of your bots (SoxBot III) and noticed that it had not edited since 2009, but I think that this is a brilliant idea. I think that you should get the bot running again, and if you don't want it yourself I would be happy to take over the running myself. There are a lot of new editors, particularly IPs, who just mess around clicking buttons and saving and this needs to be reverted. So can you get back to me please? Thanks,  Rcsprinter  (talk)  19:32, 30 September 2011 (UTC)