User talk:X0pher38

June 2009
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Cameron Scott (talk) 22:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

This is how it works
You can add stuff but without sources it will be removed, you are trying to add radical changes to the article. Those changes will be removed and the article locked to you unless you head to the talk page and discuss those changes with other editors. --Cameron Scott (talk) 22:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Ok, but most changes I made were simply removing obviously inflamatory and biased language and phrasing, as well as some grammer mistakes. The portions I added can be attruted to information from Shocker's Web site, which I can credit as soon as I figure out how.