User talk:X522

October 2016
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Neal Sher, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 04:18, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Neal Sher, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. FalconK (talk) 04:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Neal Sher. Jim1138 (talk) 04:26, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Neal Sher, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ~ Junior5a   (Talk)   Cont  05:51, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Neal Sher. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)