User talk:XAgememnonX/Verginia

Peer Review Complete.Tjna57 (talk) 02:04, 24 November 2020 (UTC)tjna57

Good afternoon. The following is a summary of my peer review thoughts, the full document can be found here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:XAgememnonX/Verginia/Googoogoo165_Peer_Review It may be beneficial to convey the importance of the topic a more strongly in the lead of the article, and provide an outline for the sections of the article. The article is well-ordered, but could perhaps benefit from an article section dedicated to more backround on Verginia if possible. Coverage of the article is good, and draws from multiple sources effectively. It is neutral in tone and your addition of literary references serves the article well. One of the source links appears to be broken for me (http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-bio/3601.html). Overall, the article has strong prose, but consider a few additions to the lead or backround to flesh it out even further. Googoogoo165 (talk) 20:23, 26 November 2020 (UTC)