User talk:XDJwelcome

Welcome!
Hello, XDJwelcome, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Please read Notability and Verifiability. Deb (talk) 15:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Midas king


A tag has been placed on Midas king requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AbrahamFernd (talk) 15:32, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Midas king for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Midas king is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Midas king until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 21:02, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Midas king


A tag has been placed on Midas king requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://soundcloud.com/midaskingmusic. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. red dogsix (talk) 21:55, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Talk:Midas king, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 01:40, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 02:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. Wgolf (talk) 02:21, 17 May 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Materialscientist (talk) 04:29, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Midas king
I didn't delete the article-a admin did that...Wgolf (talk) 23:59, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:02, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Midas King
Please stop canvassing everyone who's deleted to write it for you. If all these people think the article wasn't good enough, then it probably wasn't good enough- especially as Articles for deletion/Midas king says that they weren't notable, and the article was unambiguously promotional and copyright violations. If you want to recreate it, first read WP:COI, which strongly suggests you shouldn't- if they're really notable, someone without a COI will write an article instead. If you still want to write the article, it will need to obey WP:NPOV, and show significant, independent coverage from reliable sources, per WP:GNG and WP:BIO. I would recommend using the WP:AFC process, so you get feedback before the article gets properly created. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:36, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

it's been marked that only the administrators can write it for me, so am ready to share the info for better editing. Hope you understand now? am new here, assistance needed.


 * If you really think they're notable enough (which I question if it's been deleted many times before), then you can use the WP:AFC process to create a draft article. If/when a reviewer thinks the draft is fine, they can get an admin to move it to the correct place.
 * However, my real advice is they probably aren't notable enough to meet WP:GNG and WP:BIO if it's been deleted so many times before. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:53, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Bro. I have tried to use the, This is all I see cos I am not able to edit the article draft except an admin help to create it. "This page is currently protected so that only administrators can create it." Assistance needed by an admin.


 * No, you can create a draft at Draft: Midas King and use WP:AFC to submit it for review. If the reviewer thinks that the draft is good enough, then they can get an admin to move it. Put simply, no admin is going to unprotect the article space unless you've created a good draft article. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:18, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

It's same, only the admins can create, 'This page is currently protected so that only administrators can create it." help needed.


 * I've explained 3 times how to do it, create a draft article as explained 3 times above. When you have an acceptable draft article, then and only then ask an admin to unprotect the page. If you ask them now without evidence of a good article, they'll just say no. I'm being as clear as I can, if other users thing they can explain it better then feel free. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:04, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Already done that but it says only the admins can create the page, redirecting me there...help to try and see what i mean