User talk:XEillisx

Welcome!
  Hello, XEillisx!  Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial Learn everything you need to know to get started. Introduction to contributing • Editing

• Referencing

• Images

• Tables

• Policies and guidelines

• Talk pages

• Navigating

• Manual of Style

The Teahouse Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips 
 * Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
 * It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
 * If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
 * Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
 * When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
 * If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
 * Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 20:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)


 * That's a very helpful set of links. Thank you very much! XEillisx (talk) 20:58, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Marzena Ozarek Szilke
Hello, I see you've been trying to include information in the article, but another editor has reverted you several times claiming that some of the information might be defamatory. When dealing with sensitive BLP material, the onus is on the editor who wishes to retain disputed material (WP:BLPUNDEL), which is you in this case. Please start a discussion at the article talk page addressing the editor's concerns if you still wish to restore the material. Thank you. Throast  { { ping }} me! (talk &#124; contribs) 12:30, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Oops, you already did. I see that there has been some participation, but not enough to warrant full restoration imo. Maybe open a request for comment and see if you can get a firmer consensus? Throast  { { ping }} me! (talk &#124; contribs) 12:36, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * That sounds like a good idea! The discussion definitely could use some additional opinion.
 * I posted request for comment. Thanks for the advice! XEillisx (talk) 15:36, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * This is a site about the researcher and his bio, the site is not used to evaluate research, it is not a site dedicated to a pregnant mummy but a researcher. The content defames and discredits the researcher's scientific achievements 212.180.170.218 (talk) 15:39, 8 March 2023 (UTC)