User talk:XJ784

 Hi XJ784, and Please excuse this intrusion as you have been around a bit already but if no one has said it before: Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around:


 * Table of Contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.


 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
 * The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[Image:Signature_icon.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

 Good luck, and have fun. FWIW, Bzuk (talk) 14:38, 19 July 2011 (UTC).

Talkback
The Bushranger One ping only 18:05, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Vulcan ACR
If you're working on resolving the issues brought up during the ACR, it would be helpful to note this on the ACR page. If not, then carry on, and we'll close the ACR for failure to respond.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:26, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * No. The ACR is not my baby. The existing page (and I speak as an ex-Vulcan pilot) still has issues and had I been informed the ACR was being applied for, would have advised against it. There has been no discussion referring to the ACA by any editors which I find curious. My opinion is that the page still has some way to go and should be resubmitted when ready. XJ784 (talk) 15:55, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your prompt response. I'll start the process to close the ACR.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:04, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Notification of the intent to ACR was announced on WP:Aircraft's main discussion forum months ago, before you even became heavily involved in the article. To be kept easily aware of what is going on in the WP:Aviation community, we simplifed and automated the notification process within a single template, Template:WPAVIATION Announcements. Also, multiple edits by myself have listed "the A-class Review" as a reason for the edit in the article's Version History, and the talkpage for the Avro Vulcan has a link within the mainbox at the top to the review. There have been signs of the Review's existence; you may have been unfamiliar with them. Kyteto (talk) 18:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the information. I'm sorry to have caused problems here but I use WP constantly for other matters and trust that it's accurate. XJ784 (talk) 16:10, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567123181 your edit] to Avro Vulcan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s and 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:41, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
 * the face of it, a strike aircraft would be entirely suitable for an attack on the Falklands.' http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/118426 'Falklands: FCO to MOD  sale of Vulcans to Argentina – no clearance given for sales – declassified 2012 (& attached pdf

February 2014
I am trying to understand your recent edit to the film El Dorado, you have deleted the Technicolor reference, when the poster quite clearly states that this is the case? Regards, David J Johnson (talk) 13:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for your reply on my Talk page. My reason for reversion was that, as mentioned above, the film poster and film credits mention "Technicolor". Whilst I appreciate your technical reply, I still think that the article(s) should mention that they were color films - whether or not they were shot in Technicolor process or developed in that process. Suggest we await consensus from other editors, who have reverted your change? Best regards, David, David J Johnson (talk) 20:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * It is confusing but the category is for 'Films shot in Technicolor' with 'shot' being the operative word. It was a murky business, films were usually shot with Eastmancolor post 1955 and the lab that produced the negative was not necessarily the one or ones to produce the release prints. A classic example is 'The Guns of Navarone'. It was made in UK/Greece and the Eastmancolor negative was developed by Technicolor UK which produced beautiful dye-transfer prints for UK and the initial roadshow US release. But for the main US release, instead of shipping matricies to Technicolor Hollywood for dye transfer printing, the negative was shipped to a budget lab in the US and recut for Eastmancolor positive printing. Hence some films and posters say colour by Technicolor whilst others say color by Pathé. The chopping of the film is why a really pristine restoration of this title is sadly out of reach. Regards, Andy XJ784 (talk) 12:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings
To You and Yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:44, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of three-strip Technicolor films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guy Green ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_three-strip_Technicolor_films check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_three-strip_Technicolor_films?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of three-strip Technicolor films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Wilcox.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:10, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of three-strip Technicolor films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page April in Paris.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of three-strip Technicolor films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Allied Artists.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of three-strip Technicolor films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Easy to Love.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)