User talk:XLManny0

You need to go and get information regarding the Loan 'Luke Simpson' had to Nantwich town. Leaving a blank space is harmful to a players career! Instead of keep watching how it is edited spend some time to do some research.

September 2014
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Your recent edit to the page Ben Amos appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 10:30, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Luke Simpson, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:44, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Luke Joyce. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 11:25, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

May 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Luke Simpson. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:43, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Luke Simpson
Simpson made eight league appearances (six starts and two as sub) for Accrington, as listed on Soccerbase and the Sky Sports Yearbook. Why do you keep changing it to ten? Samuel J Walker (talk) 14:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Luke Simpson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unexplained removal of content and addition of unsourced statistics. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:39, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:09, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Luke Simpson. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:46, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Luke Simpson. Mattythewhite (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Luke Simpson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:56, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:57, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Luke Simpson. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:38, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Luke Simpson. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:35, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Luke Simpson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:21, 15 August 2016 (UTC)