User talk:XPressed

About Mike Handcock
I just want to say that you wrote the article very well. However, you wrote it in a method that sort of promotes the individual and used references that aren't the best. It just happens that Mike Handcock does not pass our various policies on inclusion.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 01:39, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Ryulong, Thank you for your comment on my talk page. Just to make sure I understand you perfectly--are you telling me that there is no way this bio will make it because of the policies on inclusion? Even if I change the wording? (I can't improve on the references). I just want to make sure so I don't waste a lot of time trying to improve something that will end up being deleted. Thank you for your time and help. I appreciate it. --XPressed (talk) 08:39, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It just does not appear that Mr. Handcock falls within our various guidelines and policies, which you can read here and here. The article is very well written. It's just that it reads like a promotional piece and it's a whole lot of nothing particularly important. It will likely get deleted, and should stay that way unless Mr. Handcock does something that gets him mainstream media attention for his work.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 07:55, 4 October 2010 (UTC)