User talk:XRaySPECial

Your edit contains two verifiably false pieces of information as follows: As editor, Hegseth published numerous, controversial articles opposing homosexuality, same sex marriage, abortion, ethnic and racial diversity, premarital sex, feminism and affirmative action.

This is cited with: http://theprincetontory.com/main/2001-02-issues/

I have reviewed the cited material and found that the articles contained there do not oppose any of these topics.

In addition, the word "controversial" is subjective. This articles' prior debate over the word controversial does not provide conclusive evidence that any of the articles were factually controversial.

In addition, your edit contains the following language:

"The April 2002 issue of the Princeton Tory, entitled "Killing Feminism," also suggested that Halle Berry received her Oscar award due to "the racial identity of the actor." cited with: http://theprincetontory.com/main/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/2002-04.pdf

This summary demonstrably false. The article, in its entirety reads as follows:

''Congratulations to Halle Berry for her Oscarworthy achievement this year. We only wish the performance itself was considered as important as the racial identity of the actor doing it. Normally, it’s the hounds in the media who blow up the racial element, ignoring the specific achievement of a given award-winner. In this case, it was Berry herself who made a point of accepting the award on behalf of an entire race. Her hysteria set her apart from her more dignified counterpart, Denzel Washington, whose acceptance speech acknowledged the racial milestone but made it second place to his individual ability as an actor. Kudos.''

Interpreted correctly, this indicates that Halle Berry believes her own race to be important. It does not suggest that that she received an Oscar because of her race.

Your repeated edits of this material appear to constitute vandalism. Please desist. Thank you. Waarvoor (talk) 03:33, 23 July 2012 (UTC)