User talk:XXI21

 Note: Remember to always substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.

[Admin: block | [ unblock] / Info: contribs | interiot's tool | [ page moves] | [ block log] | [ block list]]

Image tagging for Image:Octibl.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Octibl.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 16:10, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Aribl.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Aribl.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 20:06, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ibliscomics.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ibliscomics.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Razor Claw, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jdchamp31 13:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Dart Man, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jdchamp31 13:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Craziee Kid, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jdchamp31 13:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Jdchamp31 13:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You have made 3 new articles that are considered vandalism. Please Stop.
 * All your edits have been reverted or deleted. Please refrain from further experiments with Wikipedia (inlcluding creating a portal and a category), and concentrate on useful editing instead. Please refrain from making inflammatory "jokes" on your userpage as well. IF you continue this behaviour, you will be blocked. Fram 13:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Final Warning
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia you will be blocked from editing. Jdchamp31 16:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.


 * Please stop blanking your user page that is a violation of Wikipedia Rules Jdchamp31 17:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No, it's not "a violation of Wikipedia Rules" for one to edit or even blank one's own Talk page. --ElKevbo 17:16, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually it is a violation and I think that if we are going to argue then an admin should step in and tell us you may be allowed to do it which changes my argument above but it is not usually appropriate especially one for a block Jdchamp31 17:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Just because one *can* edit one's Talk page and remove warning doesn't mean that it's a good idea. :) --ElKevbo 18:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)