User talk:X Infotech

August 2017
The page Draft:X infotech looks rather as though it may be intended to advertise or promote its subject, which is not permitted by Wikipedia policy. Even more serious, however, is the fact that a significant part of the content was copied from one or more other sources. It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. On this occasion, not only is there no evidence that the copyright owner has licensed the content for free reuse in the terms I have described, but there is clear evidence to the contrary, namely the copyright notice "Copyright © 2017 X Infotech. All rights reserved" on a web page containing relevant content. The page has therefore been deleted.

Both your editing and your user name make it clear that this account is being used to represent a company, which is not permitted, as an account must be only for an individual person. Therefore you must not continue to use this account, but you are welcome to create a personal account for your own use. A user name such as "A. B. Smith at X infotech" would make it clear that the account is an individual one while at the same time having the advantage of transparency concerning your connection to the company.

Before doing any more editing concerning X infotech you should read Wikipedia's guideline on conflict of interest. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:18, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )  11:37, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

As you have continued to use this talk page inappropriately, I have revoked your access. --Yamla (talk) 13:22, 29 September 2017 (UTC)