User talk:Xakelari

License tagging for File:Pazo de Sistallo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pazo de Sistallo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:30, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Verdes-Montenegro family has been accepted
 Verdes-Montenegro family, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Missvain (talk) 16:18, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Verdes-Montenegro_family help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Why the C-grading?
Missvain, I'm the article's author and although I'm pleased that it has finally been created after such a long time since its submission, I wonder why it has been graded as C-class. I've read the Wikipedia's grading system section and frankly don't see that the article lacks reliable sources -quite the opposite- or show any significant gaps or missing information. Apparently there is an issue with tagging a picture but that's all. It seems to me that rating the article as C-class might have been the result of someone's arbitrary and subjective decision. Maybe you might find it boring or of little interest, but I understand that is an altogether different matter. Best regards Xakelari