User talk:Xandercrisel1/sandbox

Group 29 Doing the Review
Review #1 I agree with Xiaoxuan. This article needs to be longer with more information added to fulfill the requirements of the project. I would elaborate more on the preparation of the compound and uses of the compound in lab/medicine. How the compound is used for explosives sounds really interesting, so I would talk about that. Also, like Xiaoxuan said,you should add an image of your compound. To get more points, I would recommend adding more information to the table. Also references should be in proper format. LauraCortes25 (talk) 20:28, 2 November 2012 (UTC) Review #2 Hi, this is Karthik Balakrishnan and my netid is blkrshn2. Attached are my peer review comments:

First and foremost, please elaborate more, providing information about the chemical details of your compound. the chembox will be a good idea for this, and also have subsections in your main article, which will be more visually pleasing to read. furthermore, have citations and references. My comments are similar to that of Xiaoxuan and Laura, they have pointed out what needs to be added already. Review #3 Hi,my name is Xiaoxuan Chen and my netid is xchen56.

I think your wikipedia page is too short to even get to the requirements of this project. You don't have chem box, no properties, no history of the chemical, no reactions. The requirements for this project includes Properties, Occurrences, History, Production, Reactions You will also need to add citation.

So I would suggest, instead of putting links on your page, you can rephrase or cite some of the important information and try to make it an article.

This article is inferior and is not ready to be uploaded
This article, like most from this class, reads poorly and requires major help from a professional chemist. Ask your teacher to contact the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals. Please do not upload this article until it meets our minimal standardsSmokefoot (talk) 01:44, 19 December 2012 (UTC)