User talk:Xanderdellus

July 2010
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. JNW (talk) 01:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Xanderellus, after reverting some vandalism, which is great, much of what you added today appears to have been copied directly from several websites. Please read WP:COPYVIO; if these additions are copyright violations, they must be removed. The best possible solution would be to significantly rewrite any such passages in your own words, then source them properly. That way there's no legal question. Thanks, JNW (talk) 01:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Good question about the mission statement; I should think it can be included, with a source. And using the church's website as a source is okay to a point--the article will be stronger if it includes content from objective outside publications. WP:PRIMARY will offer a fuller explanation. JNW (talk) 01:27, 12 July 2010 (UTC)