User talk:Xanthis

December 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=586156650 your edit] to London Gold Pool may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:37, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * id=hNsSttYnmxsC&lpg=PP1&dq=How%20We%20Got%20Here%3A%20The%20'70s.&pg=PA296#v=onepage&q=&f=false The United States, under President Richard Nixon, unilaterally without consultation with

January 2015
Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Glengarry Glen Ross (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Please do not change other users' comments on article talk pages. In any case, comments on a talk page are not in-line cites necessary for verification.''  Sum mer PhD  (talk) 23:49, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Typical Wikipedia procedure is outlined at WP:BRD. You boldly added the film/IMDb/NYT as sources for your claim. You were reverted. Discussion -- not you restoring the material then discussing it -- should follow. A strong case for asking to remove Chicago while it was being discussed could be made and I would have agreed -- and would agree -- to it. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 16:35, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Reliable sources
Thank you for your thoughtful comments on the reliable sources message board. I obviously got buried here, but appreciate the many folks who took the time to comment and to think about the issues. Formerly 98 (talk) 20:41, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Glossary of firefighting
Heyo! Regarding the comment in your edit summary, references would be fantastic!!! Please add wherever you can. :-) -- Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:15, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Zackmann08. Wow, that was quick. Given the lack of references elsewhere in the article, I imagined that nobody would take me up on the offer.  OK, I will do so as soon as I get a chance.  May I ask, do you have a particular interest or are you just generally in favor of references like a good Wikipedian? ─Xanthis (talk) 06:31, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * To be clear, I'm not saying that without a reference your addition will be reverted... As you pointed out, that page has almost no references. I am just always in favor of using references. :-) But my interest lie in the realm of firefighting in general. Hope you are well! Ping me with any questions.
 * P.S. You may find u useful in the future. Instead of having to type  you can just do  -- Zackmann08  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:51, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)