User talk:Xara245

Welcome!
Hello, Xara245, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! § FreeRangeFrog croak 19:23, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

July 2014
Hello, I'm FreeRangeFrog. I noticed that you made a change to an article, University of Liverpool, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. § FreeRangeFrog croak 19:23, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sam Walton (talk) 17:28, 17 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Just to explain why your edits to the university's article are being removed: The University has Europe's most advanced scientific teaching laboratories is a claim that must include a citation to a source other than the university itself. § FreeRangeFrog croak 17:37, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

University of Liverpool
Hi Xara. I just undid an edit of yours on the University of Liverpool content in which you removed content cited to reliable sources of information with the edit summary 'harmful content removed'. Wikipedia articles must be written from a neutral point of view, reflecting all major viewpoints, and the paragraph was well covered in the sources. As such, even though it portrays something negative, it should stay in the article. It was also the subject of some debate in which a consensus for its current form was reached. On a side note your editing history seems to suggest you may be an employee of the University; if this is the case you must declare your conflict of interest on your user page or the article's talk page (see the Terms of Use section on Paid contributions without disclosure). Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 17:56, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi again; just a reminder that if you're an employee of the university you need to state so per the Terms of Use linked above. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 17:37, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi Sam Can i put in  again the  removed  sentence   ie The Uol is  linked....

I am not an employee of the UoL and have  never been one

Thanks
 * Ok. No, that sentence is what we refer to as a peacock term; such 'achievements' should instead be demonstrated through well documented sources cited in the article. Sam Walton (talk) 18:56, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your question
Hi Xara. I saw you posted a question on your user page, which I'll answer here. I removed that content because you did not cite a reliable source for the information. Since that means readers have no way of telling that the information is true, I removed it from the article. Sam Walton (talk) 19:05, 20 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Sam, the reference  was  very  reliable  and  if you  had   looked  into  it  carefully  you  would  not  have  removed it. Do  you  have    a problem with the UoL?   You   have done  this in the  past, namely  removing  reliable  references. .Please  restore   otherwise  i will file  an official  complaint

Thanks
 * I have no problem with UoL. This was your edit, you didn't add a source for your information and the source that is at the end of that sentence doesn't mention the chemistry department. Do feel free to add that information to the article, but please cite its source. Sam Walton (talk) 19:26, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks Sum. I  will try  to  find  another  source . Co you help?  please  look  at  REF  2014  research results  and you will see the UoL Chemistry  dept  99%    4*  and 3*
 * Ah, this link would suffice I guess. You can add it to the article in the same way the computer science one is added. Sam Walton (talk) 19:54, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much  Sam Xara245