User talk:XavierTG

Proposed deletion of Bird Side
Hello, XavierTG. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Bird Side, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:56, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anakin Skywalker, Episode 1 (Podracer)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Anakin Skywalker, Episode 1 (Podracer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 09:27, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Powers because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 09:42, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Anakin Skywalker, Episode 1 (Podracer). Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Skarebo (talk) 10:21, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:28, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Power. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 10:57, 5 December 2013 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text below. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 10:59, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Response to decline: Actually, I did not. I'm sorry i vandalized the page, but could you at least shorten the block? — Preceding unsigned comment added by XavierTG (talk • contribs) 23:28, 7 December 2013

Questions
I think that Wikipedia is a great organization. But I want to know why it will take so long for my draft to be reviewed. Unfortunately, I don't have months to wait. Also, why are there so many people waiting to be reviewed? Do you really have that many people who like Wikipedia? ActiA

Speedy deletion nomination of Naboo Invasion
Hello XavierTG,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Naboo Invasion for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Dianakc (talk) 18:44, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Angry Bird Star Wars 2


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Angry Bird Star Wars 2. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Angry Birds Star Wars II. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Angry Birds Star Wars II – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.  T K K ! bark with me if you're my dog! 19:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JNW (talk) 01:06, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I didn't block you, but I see no reason why the next admin wouldn't--for incompetence, disruptive creation of articles, etc. Drmies (talk) 01:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for clearly not being here to improve the encyclopedia (blocked by on 04:53, 9 December 2013). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. De728631 (talk) 13:05, 9 December 2013 (UTC)