User talk:Xbdulaziz

Edit-warring on Economic policy of Donald Trump
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 16:55, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * You have violated the following editing restrictions on the Economic policy of Donald Trump page: "24-hr BRD cycle: If a change you make to this article is reverted, you may not reinstate that change unless you discuss the issue on the talk page and wait 24 hours (from the time of the original edit). Partial reverts/reinstatements that reasonably address objections of other editors are preferable to wholesale reverts." Snooganssnoogans (talk) 16:55, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Copyright violations
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
 * Copying text from other sources
 * Policy on copyright
 * Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
 * Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:
 * Simple introduction
 * Help pages

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Neutralitytalk 16:56, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Important notice regarding edits relating to the post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people
Neutralitytalk 21:56, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Use of "minor edit" button + edit warring + text-source integrity
Please take note of the following:


 * Help:Minor edit - Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. A minor edit is an edit that requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content.


 * Edit warring, Three-revert rule, Consensus - your recent edits constitute edit warring.


 * Citing sources, No original research - Some of your edits add material not supported by the sources you cite.


 * What Wikipedia is not - We're not a vehicle for promotion, as some of your edits have done.

--Neutralitytalk 22:02, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Economic policy of Donald Trump. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Favonian (talk) 16:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 22:35, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:03, 6 January 2020 (UTC)