User talk:Xca777

Hi, Welcome to Wikipedia. Are you the author of the paper that you keep linking to? Tdslk (talk) 04:43, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi, No, Alokprasad84 has orphaned the article (tagged the article with "This articles have very few or no incoming links") on 13:17, 27 November 2011‎. So I'm trying to add incoming links to the article from related subjects. Did I linked any unnecessary articles or added too much? If so I'm open to revisions suggested.Xca777 (talk) 06:49, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I think the question is, are you Arabacioglu? If not, what exactly is your relationship with him?   Sławomir Biały  (talk) 12:38, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi, No I'm not him again, as I mentioned on the previous answer. I'm the author of the Wikipedia article titled: Fuzzy architectural spatial analysis referencing his work. I don't have any further relations with him than similar study areas.


 * Ok, good to know. Thanks,  Sławomir Biały  (talk) 14:09, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm a little concerned about the notability of the article. At the moment, it is largely based on a single primary source that isn't independent of the subject. Is there any possibility you could expand the scope somewhat, so that it covers not just "fuzzy" architectural spatial analysis, but architectural spatial analysis more generally? I found an additional reference that is a review article (http://www.springerlink.com/content/r23uw48j6n5w1117/), and I have added it to the article.

I was about to propose the article for deletion (WP:AfD), but upon reflection felt that a more constructive direction was possible. Anyway, here was my deletion rationale:


 * This article is based on a single recently-published primary source (WP:PSTS), and as such I think it is not sufficiently notable for a Wikipedia article. Notability requires independent sources, meaning in particular that there should be no conflict of interests in the subject.  The cited source, however, originated the concept of the article (in 2010), and seems to have been referenced only once in the secondary literature, and that time only very insubstantially.  (I have, at any rate, added this second reference to the article.)

Best, Sławomir Biały  (talk) 12:39, 1 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I have also added another independent article in literature referencing the work . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.253.157.158 (talk) 19:29, 1 December 2011 (UTC)