User talk:Xcentaur/Archive 4

Endal Dog
Hi there

I would like to reaffirm that I am the sole author of this "Endal(dog)" article, the content is taken from our personal profile which explains our history and partnership. I have updated the Wikipedia article to include publications/books that feature Endal and external media (still being added to) and also an unique insight into Endal's health problems which he has worked through for 10 years. Hopefully this makes the Wikipedia article unique. Endal has been in the public for ten years, not a week goes by when there is not an article in some magazine or newspaper telling Endal's story or his recent achievements, so in the various article there must be a close similarity in content

The article to which you refered actually states at the bottom that the article is written by me

I do hope this allays any copyright infringement issues that you may have.

reagards 07:15, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Copyright (c) Allen G Parton. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License".


 * [[Image:green tick.svg|15px]]noted this on the article talk page xC | ☎  06:16, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Read again.
If you say something, please prove it immediately. I was never bad with no one user. Pa_7 was always understandable, Plumcouch is wonderful and Shez is very nice now. Don`t tell me to create a fansite for her. I`m not so big fan and I don`t have documentative edits. I`m working on very much of pages and they`re not focus on Preity. Lastly I thought, and I think it would be better if we really remove the Colbert report, but I`m not sure. But the Marie Claire remains. I know you`re leaving for a while so I really wish you all the best. Will be nice to see you again here:-) Best Regards. --Shshshsh 12:00, 4 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Proof is easy to give, and yes, well thank you for you best wishes. xC | ☎  06:16, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Endal (dog)
I feel like I am "nailing jelly to the wall" with dealing the person "Doc Glasgow" something? Bar for sending him a copy of my passport how does anyone on wikipedia prove who they are or that they wrote an article which might be on the web else where? I know you are very busy and very stressed with us beginners but boy could I use some help here. I don't mind folk giving criticism where it is due but it would be so much nicer with the addition of some guidance, that the hard of learning could grasp. Still despite the few "jobsworths" out there there are also some good guys so I'll not throw in the towel yet

take care Endal and Allen 16:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)


 * [[Image:green tick.svg|15px]]Never a problem in helping out beginners, ask me anytime :) Like the phrase, nailing jelly to the wall. You also taught me a new word jobsworth. Take care xC | ☎  06:16, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Endal (Dog)
Thanks for your kind words of support, much appreciated!

Have a great break, hope we are still here when you get back Endal and Allen 19:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Hope so too. Hope I'm still here to hang out with you. Regards, xC | ☎  06:16, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi
Hello. I see your on a wiki-break, I hope you come back soon. I need to ask a question regarding the Rani Mukerji page. Im gonna post this question on WP:INCINE to get some opinions. Do we need the info regarding her make-up artist, fashion designer blah blah blah? That's not encyclopedic. When I edited that stuff out, it was reverted by User:Shez15 and on top of that I was accussed of vandalising the article. If you get the time could you please reply. Best regards. -- Pa7 16:31, 6 May 2007 (UTC)


 * [[Image:green tick.svg|15px]]Replied on user talk.
 * We don't really need any of that, her make up artist and designer and all of that is definitely not needed. Still, if even one percent of any of that is worth keeping in the article, then let Shez add it in. If it needs to be removed, it can be removed at a later point. Regards, xC | ☎  06:16, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Aishwarya Bachchan
Please oppose on Ash's discussion page. Her name is Bachchan now, not Rai. It if's a legal name change, there is no problem here. I don't know why they keep moving the page back to Rai. And I removed the highest paid fact from her page but I'm sure people will put it back. So please take some charge on the page. Thanks. - shez_15


 * She signed an autograph with her surname as Bachchan, so clearly she has adopted it as her surname. I see it as an uncontroversial move, I haven't seen the discussions on the talk page (if any). Will have a look when I'm free. As for highest paid, drop a note on the article talk page explaining why there should no such claims on the page. Regards, xC | ☎  08:09, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello!
Hi! I didn't put the fame and popularity back. I just didn't remove it. It was like this during the protection status. And why I left? Because I discussed this with Pa_7. She told me that the Colbert should have been removed but she supported to leave the fame there. Please see in my talk page. Please discuss this with Pa_7 whether the world fame in Dixit's and Zinta's page should be kept or not. Best Regards. --Shshshsh 08:03, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * What Pa7 said was - As for the popularity thing, Im not sure because people know she's popular but it may be necessary to mention her popularity in other places. I'd probably change the name of the section - something else like In The Media or something like that. Im not really sure, what did User:xC say about this section and what do you feel about this section?
 * Firstly, we had already decided to name it In the media.
 * Secondly, look at but it may be necessary to mention her popularity in other places - note the word may - and lastly, Im not really sure.
 * Third, none of this discussion took place on the article talk page. If you could put up this discussion on the article talk page I'm sure we could discuss it and reach a conclusion there.
 * Regards, xC | ☎  08:06, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, I gotta go now. I'll ask her latter to give opinion. I realised that these arguments only slow down the progress of this page. And please remove the fame section from Madhuri Dixit's page, if your decision is so decisive. Best Regards. --Shshshsh 08:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Remove it if you like, I haven't seen the page yet.
 * Decision is decisive - erm yes, whatever you say. Regards, xC | ☎  08:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry? Haven't seen yet? So have a look. You are objecting to have this, not me. Therefore, you are the only one who is responsible removing it from all the possible pages. I go, when I be back, I'll make my edits. And I won't remove it from Dixit's page. For the opposite, I would add it back to Zinta's page if it remained in Dixit's page, although Dixit really deserves to have it. --Shshshsh 08:48, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes, I will have a look when I have the time.
 * I go, when I be back, I'll make my edits. - Do that, nobodys stopping you, my friend.
 * For the opposite, I would add it back to Zinta's page if it remained in Dixit's page - oh, so now you've started reading other pages as well? Fantastic, so why don't you bring this point up on Zinta's page, that its been included on Dixit's page, and we can finish this discussion there.
 * Regards, xC | ☎  08:52, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * oh, so now you've started reading other pages as well? Fantastic This cynical and insulting comment is a personal attack. Please respect me, as well as I do. Bye, Best Regards. --Shshshsh 08:57, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Theres nothing cynical about it, its merely fact, as you had stated earlier that you do not wish to read other talk pages and/or articles to understand why sections are removed and/or modified. Theres nothing insulting about it, I have used no words which insult you, nor is it a personal attack. You are misguided in your claims, I respect all editors, regardless of their conduct with me. Regards, xC | ☎  09:01, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I'd also like to point out that you have taken it out of context, I meant it in a positive way, that if you have started reading other articles and their respective talk pages then that is fantastic and would definitely be beneficial to our discussions related to the bollywood biopages. Therefore, it is you who is cynical, to have taken a positive comment in a negative manner. Regards, xC | ☎  09:05, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * When I told you "I don't know if I should believe in you cause you change your opinion everytime" which was definitely a fact, you considered it as a PA and also went to complain about me.
 * Now, you're telling me it's a fact too.
 * I said that your comment was cynical. Your answer was "Therefore, it is you who is cynical". I talked about the comment. You talked about me. As you said once, please comment on content and not editors. That was Another Personal Attack. --Shshshsh 09:56, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I added this fact to Preity's page again, and posted a new message to the talk page. Please don't revert, before discussing it. I'll ask Pa_7 to comment. Best Regards. --Shshshsh 10:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

(Line break) LOL. Nice try, Shshshsh. Commenting about something I have said is commenting about me indirectly. Try to focus on article improvement instead of engaging editors in pointless conversations. Regards, xC | ☎  10:09, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * As for the content you added back, go ahead - add it back and start a discussion on the article talk page. See you there Regards, xC | ☎  10:09, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't know what is the thing you're laughing on. You can laugh at me. I don't care your disparaging on me.
 * Nice try - Who are you for telling me that? It was really cynical comment, and don't tell me that it wasn't. Don't underrate me.
 * Try to focus on article improvement instead of engaging editors in pointless conversations - Don't tell me what to do. You're not my senior. I know my work very good and without your guidance.


 * As you said, see you in Preity's talkpage, Best Regards. --Shshshsh 10:50, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Whatever you say, my friend. Looking forward to your insightful comments there. Regards, xC | ☎  11:05, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

রানী মুখোপাধ্যায়Рани Мукерджи
Good evening sir, how are things? Those links you mention are interwiki links. The first part corresponds to the particular language wiki, and the second part corresponds to the page name on that particular wiki. So for instance, If I had an account on the French wiki I could link from my userpage their, to my userpage here by adding. What do these links do? Well, when your on a page that has them, take a look at the tool box on the left hand side of the page, do you notice names in foreign languages? Well this is the name of a foreign language wikipedia, when you click on it, it takes you directly to the same oage, but in a foreign language. Do you understand? As for the abreviations (the first 2 letters), I'll have a look at where you could get a list of all wikipedias and their abreviations, I think there may be something on meta. Hope that helps, but I'll get back to you. Cheers  Ry an P os tl et hw ai te  17:18, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Question
Hey Xcentaur - I'm getting a sneaky suspicion from your edits that you might be Bengali - is that true? :) – Rianaऋ 04:13, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, very Bengali, maachher jhol and all :) Well, Bengali by descent anyway - I was born in Australia and I'm an Aussie citizen - but I've lived in Kolkata for 5 years, and retain some of my Bangali-ness :) – Rianaऋ 06:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Lots of edits to Rani Mukherjee will usually go to prove something :) Reading your e-mail now. Cheers, – Rianaऋ 07:06, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * You have a reply. Cheers, – Rianaऋ 07:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Wazza
Lol, wazzup nowadays? givin CET and all? btw, teach me how to rip the header styles for the userpage :P and where did the school pic go? its to a dead link:

Lol this is the new offline messaging system Cyb3r01dX 06:53, 14 May 2007 (UTC)


 * CET for me too, i dropped and year :P Man, you got to tell me how to design a SIg like yours... and how to rip the userpage theme!
 * lol "my edits are maintenence related" Ditto :P all i do is ark for deletion, merge, and warn haha, and when i revert vandalism, i get warned by that smart Martin BOT ^_^ BTw, u on my orkut friendslist? Cyb3r01dX 07:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * i can guess the name of the admin you were chatting with :) and sent u a gtalk invite.. its cyb3roidx now, used to get loads of spam on old one .... using gtalk? what happenend with martin was that i reverted to a blank page.. and it came happily over to warn me :P —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberoidx (talk • contribs)


 * I need the code for the signature to create a box... just post yours on my talk and i'll figure the stuff out :) Cyberoid  X  ShoutOut 08:54, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

sig
lol, your sig got parsed... do itwith no wiki :P —Preceding unsigned comment added by cyberoidx (talk • contribs)

re: admin coaching
Ah Xcentaur, with words like that, how could I ever resist? :) I would be delighted to be your admin coach, of course! I will probably try to get back to you sometime tomorrow about this, though, because I'm busy tonight. Thanks for the offer, I'm glad that you wish to improve - although you're doing an excellent job already. Take care, – Rianaऋ 11:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Shiny New Sig
Lol, my shiny new sig It seems like CSS wont be dying soon... thanks for the code... Cyberoid   X   15:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. What pages are you working on? xC | ☎  15:18, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Polls
Shshshsh wants polls to be in the main article. What say? He has moved Preity's polls to the main page. Should I do the same for Rani? - shez_15 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shez 15 (talk • contribs) 05:11, 15 May 2007 (UTC).


 * No, it makes more sense to have the polls in the seperate awards page. xC | ☎  05:59, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Something for you to check out
User:Xcentaur/Admin coaching. Won't be around, but feel free to have a read. Cheers, – Rianaऋ 06:30, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * *blushes* Not at all, X! Take your time, there's no need to rush. Let me know when you've finished, be it today or next week, and I'll come around and have a look :) Regards, – Rianaऋ 06:59, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Comment
Ĺita es a diva melhor de todas sinto muito a tua falta na WWE por favor volta é um dos meus maiores sonhos.adoro-te muito e a LITADDT e lembra-te nós te adoramos muito mesmo,volta,volta por favor!Beijos do fundo do coração.mix. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.138.252.118 (talk • contribs)


 * Erm, sorry but I don't understand the language. If I manage to translate it somehow, I'll write back to you. Take care xC | ☎  06:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

In the media.
I don't know what's the matter there but the In the media section looks messy. Its first idea was popularity, ok. But now we have things that are not matching with each other. Polls, success and Tv appearances should be kept in the media. But Goair, Filmfare hosting, Cannes and even the art gallery new fact is representation\commitment. The personal life also looked messy without the headings. Headings don't disturb nobody, the first part of it was early life and it was well by every other user. So you shifted it to the personal life section, fine, but we need a headline for it. I'll make my edits. Please discuss in the talk page if you have some problems. Best Regards, --Shshshsh 13:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I'll make my edits. - do that.
 * Actually, the entire portion about representation as a whole is at best trivia.
 * Firstly, headings are good for organizing content. But when the content itself is only a few lins in each section which can very well be together, then adding superfluous headings seems pointless.
 * Filmstars attend film festivals all the time, so why is that notable?
 * She co-hosted such and such event is also non-notable, stars host shows all the time, such information has no long term value.
 * The GoAir bit talks about her promoting a particular airline, and shouldn't be there. Wikipedia is not an advertising service for these airlines.
 * Appearing in KWK is info which should be on KWK's page and not on Zinta's.
 * Being a guest judge in indian idol is trivia, it can be incorporated into the idol article, not zinta's.
 * As for her walking the ramp, I am undecided about it. Will look up a few other articles where this line might apply, and then get back to you.
 * To be frank, I am too busy at the moment to raise objections to the things being put into the article. Raising concerns with either of the two articles is a time-consuming energy-draining exercise in patience.
 * If you believe the content you are adding has encyclopedic value, please do add it in. If its not required, it can be removed later.
 * Regards, xC | ☎  13:54, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I'll make my edits. - I did.


 * Actually, the entire portion about representation as a whole is at best trivia. - Trivia is information. We're here to write about her. More than a half of wikipedia pages (let's take Rani Mukerji for example, where you didn't make any edits like these, BTW), use information like this.


 * Firstly, headings are good for organizing content. But when the content itself is only a few lins in each section which can very well be together, then adding superfluous headings seems pointless. - For organizing content, yes. But also to separate between differen teams. Also to make well ordered section, rather than one big and tiring block.


 * Filmstars attend film festivals all the time, so why is that notable? - No. Here you're going through removal, and that's I won't accept with you to do. They are not going all the time. Whenever they go, we mention. Look, during her career years, she has gone only one time. BTW, You can say Filmstars _______ all the time for very much of things here. So what, Do you have to remove all of them? do all of them non-notable?


 * She co-hosted such and such event is also non-notable, stars host shows all the time, such information has no long term value. - I think for you everything is non-notable. She is not cohosting shows all the time. Filmfare is the major award ceremony in India. If it was an Oscar, you would never object that. Am I wrong?


 * The GoAir bit talks about her promoting a particular airline, and shouldn't be there. Wikipedia is not an advertising service for these airlines. - I removed the tag line. Now it looks good. well, if that's wrong as a commitment, so I'll put it in the controversies section, there was a big issue regarding her boyfriend in it.


 * Appearing in KWK is info which should be on KWK's page and not on Zinta's. - There are very much of readers who don't know what is KWK at all. Nobody will enter WP and search for "Koffee With Karan". There is no other way to get access to the KWK. Only through the actors page. I haven't turned back the whole TV appearances table, even through it appears in Linsey Lohan page for example.


 * Being a guest judge in indian idol is trivia, it can be incorporated into the idol article, not zinta's. - In will Smith's page you can see it is written that he appeared in the show.


 * As for her walking the ramp, I am undecided about it. Will look up a few other articles where this line might apply, and then get back to you. - apart from being an actress she is also known as model, so it's important to note what she is doing as a model. She is modeling.


 * So fine, if you see the commitments in other Hollywood pages, you'll see. It describes for actor's activities.
 * Everything you mentioned above is important. It is important to write about an actress' activities, whether it's a co-hosting, modeling, attending film festivals (which is very important) etc. etc. we're here to write about it. You can say non-notable about everything. Apart from it, you're not the owner of this page, and when you want to do such important edits, which include removal of information, which was there before for very much of time and was accepted by all the other users, you have discuss. You can't do things for your own, and remove wide information just because you think it's non-notable. Best Regards. --Shshshsh 14:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * If I said something offensive, I didn't mean that. I respect you and I think you're a great editor. We haven't had arguments today. I hope we keep cool and pleasant working manner. --Shshshsh 14:54, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I'll make my edits. - I did.
 * Good for you, my friend.
 * Actually, the entire portion about representation as a whole is at best trivia. - Trivia is information. We're here to write about her. More than a half of wikipedia pages (let's take Rani Mukerji for example, where you didn't make any edits like these, BTW), use information like this.
 * Here we go again... din't make these edits to this page and those edits to that page...
 * Firstly, headings are good for organizing content. But when the content itself is only a few lins in each section which can very well be together, then adding superfluous headings seems pointless. - For organizing content, yes. But also to separate between differen teams. Also to make well ordered section, rather than one big and tiring block.
 * Very good, we're on the same wavelength here that big blocks of content need to be split up. Now have a look at WP:MOS and have a look at a few FAs and if you can find any respectable article with sub-sections containing just a few lines, please do drop me a note.
 * Filmstars attend film festivals all the time, so why is that notable? - No. Here you're going through removal, and that's I won't accept with you to do. They are not going all the time. Whenever they go, we mention. Look, during her career years, she has gone only one time. BTW, You can say Filmstars _______ all the time for very much of things here. So what, Do you have to remove all of them? do all of them non-notable?
 * See, heres the thing, look up WP:RECENT, they have something called the ten year rule. If this information would constitute encyclopedic knowledge that is worth something ten years down the line, then we keep it. If not, we remove.
 * She co-hosted such and such event is also non-notable, stars host shows all the time, such information has no long term value. - I think for you everything is non-notable. She is not cohosting shows all the time. Filmfare is the major award ceremony in India. If it was an Oscar, you would never object that. Am I wrong?
 * Yes, you are wrong. I still would. Unless something notable happened while she was hosting it, or she said something or did something that became notable due to media attention, it is non-notable. Celebrities host such events all the time. On that event's page on Wikipedia, add the information. You seem to misunderstand what I am saying - I am saying that the information is non notable within this context, ie. it is unneccessary on this page although it can very well be useful on some other page.
 * The GoAir bit talks about her promoting a particular airline, and shouldn't be there. Wikipedia is not an advertising service for these airlines. - I removed the tag line. Now it looks good. well, if that's wrong as a commitment, so I'll put it in the controversies section, there was a big issue regarding her boyfriend in it.
 * I oppose that because it looks like advertising for the airlines. Thats the only reason. If indeed there was a big hue and cry over it, by all means write up a para and add it into controversies. I would support you if you did that, no doubt.
 * Appearing in KWK is info which should be on KWK's page and not on Zinta's. - There are very much of readers who don't know what is KWK at all. Nobody will enter WP and search for "Koffee With Karan". There is no other way to get access to the KWK. Only through the actors page. I haven't turned back the whole TV appearances table, even through it appears in Linsey Lohan page for example.
 * You know what? I get the feeling this is going to be a bone of contention for a good while to come. So lets put back the television appearances, and lets update that each time she appears on TV, each time she comes on a news show, each time shes on a chat show. Lets do that. You seem to be volunteering to put it back - go ahead, put back the TV shows, under filmography.
 * Being a guest judge in indian idol is trivia, it can be incorporated into the idol article, not zinta's. - In will Smith's page you can see it is written that he appeared in the show.
 * Where on smith's page is that written? And anyway, its TV appearance, so add it in, be my guest.
 * As for her walking the ramp, I am undecided about it. Will look up a few other articles where this line might apply, and then get back to you. - apart from being an actress she is also known as model, so it's important to note what she is doing as a model. She is modeling.
 * Excellent. Add it in. There is an increasing trend for several years now for celebrities to walk the ramp for designer friends, so I don't see how it is notable in a long-term context, but its very clear you want to put it in. So go ahead, put it in.
 * So fine, if you see the commitments in other Hollywood pages, you'll see. It describes for actor's activities.
 * Which others? Examples, please. As far as I know, the page as a whole describes the actor's activities, in fact, what else would it describe?
 * Everything you mentioned above is important. - Nope
 * It is important to write about an actress' activities, whether it's a co-hosting, modeling, attending film festivals (which is very important) etc. etc. - adding a double et cetera does not make you right. film festivals are actually not very important, for the simple number of them happening, if something notable happens at the film festival, then it is notable.
 * You can say non-notable about everything. - Nope, only for things which are actually non notable
 * Apart from it, you're not the owner of this page, - spot on. May I suggest you repeat the same lines to certain other editors as well?
 * and when you want to do such important edits, which include removal of information, which was there before for very much of time and was accepted by all the other users, you have discuss. - i assume you mean that discussion is important? coming from someone who barely posted on the article talk pages, i find that supremely enlightening, i'll definitely keep that in mind. thank you for pointing that out to me.
 * You can't do things for your own, and remove wide information just because you think it's non-notable. - Ah yes, we must keep things in the article because you think they are notable. I get it now, no problem.
 * So, in summary, I have agreed to roughly everything you want to do with the article. Go ahead and make whatever changes you like. Honestly, I don't have the time to oppose anything at this moment. Its taken very long to get the article to improve even the little bit that it did. I'm willing to settle in for a second cleanup after you've completed your additions.
 * Best of luck in all your work, and my best regards xC | ☎  17:45, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Please have a look on Ellen DeGeneres and Jon Stewart pages. The hosted the Oscar of the last two years. They have whole sections on their hosting.


 * I didn't say that we have to add every new show she appeares in. In fact, I added only the notable ones. KWK and II have their own pages on WP, and as I said, there are readers who don't know what is KWK or II. The access to the show comes through its mention in an actor's page.


 * Why didn't you mention the appearance of popular shows in Lindsey Lohan page?


 * Apart from it, modeling and walking on the ramp, especially when the actor doesn't do it very often, worthy of being mentioned. It's an expression of Media.


 * Someone removed the entire career section of Smith.


 * Yes I still mean that. It will be unfair to leave something in an actor's page, when the same things have been removed fron Preity's page, because if it happened, I would have the rightest reason to revert the page to its previous version. And yes I still mean that: neither you nor me are the owners of these pages. And all these statements were there before, so keeping them does not mean doing things that I want to.


 * I think we should wait for Pa_7 and Plumcouch to give their opinions before doing any significant edits which could bring to an edit war or tasteless arguments. They have been working on this page since the very beginning of its existence. I respect them, and if they say that we have to remove certain things, I won't oppose.


 * Actors don't appear in festivals frequently. When it comes to a very popular film festival like Cannes, it is very notable. It is an important and famous commitment in the full sense of the word. And it is also considered as representation. Zinta represented her country in this festival. isn't it notable?


 * Very much of pages, and I don't even have to give names, use Early Life sections in the beginning. You have transferred its content to the personal life section. Fine. But there is a need to separate between early life, relationship miscellaneous issues in the career section. We have to distinguish between her early life\family and her boufriend. And believe me, it is not so difficult to expand it. You can also help. It's very easy to remove things, but you can also help to expand it as we here to write about her, not removing information.


 * I don't intend adding back the TV appearances. You don't have to exaggerate. Writing few popular shows is definitely sufficient.


 * And please Xc, I'm here to dicuss things, not to fight. So please try to br polite as much difficult it would be. It's not nice poke fun at me everytime you disagree with my opinions. I don't appreciate this kind of talking manner. Best Regards, --Shshshsh 18:46, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I fail to see the point of this entire post of yours, I've agreed with everything you had to say and you have decided you are going to put everything in. There is nothing more left to say. I wish you best of luck in all you do, and my best regards, xC | ☎  04:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Brag talk
Got myself a shiny userpage. Hmm... admin coaching cool... i was gonna signup too :P anyways, where's your CET center? Cyberoid   X   17:02, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Some girls college in Dadar :( You prepared for CET? man i gonna get F***ed its been months since i studied What you gonna do after CET? which other exams?  Cyberoid    X   04:30, 16 May 2007 (UTC)


 * LOL, its the opposite for me, physics, then math and chem haha... Yup, its that IES college...  Cyberoid    X   04:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm.. no bits for me, i didn't get 80% :( BTw, if i do a request for speedy deletion, and the article is deleted, is it removed from my contirbs too? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cyberoidx (talk • contribs) 04:37, 16 May 2007 (UTC).
 * which programming languages you know? i have a wicked plan in mind... but its gonna take time, and more people... i was thinking of Sanchit Karve (hope u rememebr him) he's become pretty good too, serach google for born2c0de and you'll see a lot of links to his stuff... and check the signpost and all for this new commitment thingy incase your wikipedia account gets hacked...
 * LOL, the funny part is joining cleanup commitee and Watch groups together. I love welcoming and wanring them at the same time. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cyberoidx (talk • contribs) 04:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC).
 * hmm... i was thinking of smth... like maybe doing a FON kinda thingy in mumbai, using Adhoc ICS (its there in windows) see Wireless_mesh_network, which would eliminate the need for a router to host a Wifi hotspot, all you need is a device capable of connecting to wifi stuff...

So if someone wanted to share a net connection, he could do it with just a simple program, and no extra hardware....... shhhhhhhh keep this secret :P  Cyberoid    X   04:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)


 * hmm... i noticed that we dont have pic for the actors, m gonna work on it and get someone to release them under GFDL... know a web designer who makes websites for indian movies... a lot of them... Raj  Cyberoid    X   04:57, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Personally i couldn't really care about bollywood, but i'll do my best to get those pics... just make a list of the pics which are unavailable....

—Preceding unsigned comment added by cyberoidx (talk • contribs)