User talk:Xcentaur/Archive 5

Coaching
You have a few comments waiting for you on your coaching page :) After we finish that discussion, we'll move on to some new stuff, OK? Cheers, – Rianaऋ 08:18, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Polls
Hello, I was looking at Rani Mukerji's page and saw the section titled Popular polls. Don't you think these should be moved to the awards and honours page? What do you think -- Pa7 00:02, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry forgot to sign in! -- Pa7 00:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

I think so too pa_7 but Preity's polls are on her main page. And that's what shshshsh and Xc have decided. - shez_15

Cyberoidx
hmm... actually i might not get any barnstar ... m so pissed of at User:Real96 She prolly lifted a header from somewhere from her userpage... and i told her that i'll be using it too, she comes around and starts messing with my page without telling me... WTF? you leave smth on wikipedia, then it is under GFDL or smth, and i have all rights to use it... she friggin came and changed all the colours, add credits to her self, and even changed my talk page rules... If this ain't vandalism what the hell is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by cyberoidx (talk • contribs)
 * Dude, please remember to sign your posts.
 * Well, I've looked through Real's edits... Real96 was just trying to help, from what I understand. Please note, by convention us editors don't edit each other's userpages... in reality, we don't own our userspace either. Just drop Real96 a note saying you appreciate the help on your userpage but you prefer your version. Don't make such a big issue out of it, mate, she's just givin you a hand since you're starting out here. xC | ☎  13:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi again!
I've posted a new message to Preity Zinta's page. Please have a look. --Shshshsh 13:41, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Mmm you can keep ignoring me, but this message is important now, I know you're busy now but I'll be grateful if you devote two minutes of your expensive time. Thanks, --Shshshsh 17:51, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * sigh No-one is ignoring you Shshshsh, I'm on RC patrol which is why I haven't looked up any articles. xC | ☎  17:52, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * OK my dear, I haven't seen that as a personal attack. I just proved something, and don't think that I'm happy with your absence from Preity's page. I do think that you're a great editor as I'm watching your hard work here. We have our arguments. For me it also was tiring to sit on Preity's page. It's very difficult as I usually work on very much of other pages. I stopped creating new pages, and now I'm also busy on real life. Now I wanna wait for Plumcouch and Pa_7 is leaving for a journey of one weak. Meanwhile, I want to work on other pages when I have the time. I know you can tell me: "your plans don't interest me" but nevertheless.


 * By the way, Shez posted this message to me only, and yes I got that you were talking about me. That's why I reacted like this. I also wish you the best of luck. Best Regards, --Shshshsh 18:24, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Wish you all the best. Take care, xC | ☎  18:25, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Shahrukh Khan
Hi there. I don't really know why including lists of the brands that an actor endorses is generally not allowed on Wikipedia. I have seen discussions for most actors articles and many editors believe these kind of lists are just trivial information and not very relevant. I don't see anything bad about including the list of brands an actor endorses but maybe it should just be mentioned within his career section and not be put into a list as some editors don't think these kind of lists to be encylopedic. Shakirfan 18:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * replied on user talk xC | ☎  05:18, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

"Destroy Everything You Touch
How was changing the links to the review sites so they work (for example, changing Musiccomh to MusicOMH.com) violating Wikipedia's NPOV rule? 76.180.81.228 20:04, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * It is POV since the article Destroy Everything You Touch states the album was well-recieved by critics without stating who these critics are.
 * Secondly, in the section reception, only positive reviews are included, no regatives, which is clearly POV.
 * Regards, xC | ☎  20:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, the biased text still there, you only changed the names of the websites so that they were misspelled again, so that confused me a little. I can't seem to find any negative reviews, so I will remove the "Reception" section when I eventually get around to it.
 * Also, that was me who made those edits, I was not logged in at the time. Inkbottle 20:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * MWT reverts, my bad, should have looked further in the history. As long as you're looking over the article and taking care of the content, no need to remove it outright. Shift it temporarily to the article talk page until we can find some reviews to balance things out. Not neccessarily negative reviews, something about total number of albums sold, critical appreciation, things like that. Basically we just have to prevent the article from looking biased.
 * Best of luck, cheers! xC | ☎  20:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Ben Sager
Hello ! xC | ☎  I didn’t mean to step on your tag at the Ben Sager article. However, it looks like someone is removing it from the page. Just a heads up. Have a great day. Shoessss talk
 * Hey ! xC | ☎ , after reviewing the article again, I removed your tag and placed a speedy delete notice in its place.  The more I looked at the facts of the young man the more convinced I felt this was the more accurate choice.  Shoessss talk


 * Thanks for the note. Actually, I had put a db on it, the editor kept removing it. I was on RCP at that time, so I couldn't keep putting it back, thats why just before leaving I put a notability and went to sleep :P Nice to know theres someone looking over these articles, take care xC | ☎  05:18, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Flamethrowers
Hmmm, that's an odd one. Indefblocked now anyway, but for the future you can try pointing them towards the userpage policy, and a gentle but firm reminder about what is generally acceptable. There isn't a template warning for that one, but a bit of common sense goes a long way ;) I haven't followed up on your admin coaching yet, but you should have something there within the next 4 hours or so, I promise! :) Take care X, – Riana ⁂  04:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Made a note of WP:UP, forgot about that one, I did... :P xC | ☎  05:21, 18 May 2007 (UTC)


 * copy of msg posted on UT:Riana
 * Ah, thanks for having a look. What a day yesterday!
 * 400 edits, my first barnstar, flamethrowers on user talks, 5 reports on AIV, and discovering a page dealing with how dashes are supposed to be used...
 * Never a dull moment...
 * Cheers! xC | ☎  05:23, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Woah, lotsa questions! :)
OK, I'll try to answer these one by one:

And now I have to go see what I can write up for your admin coaching page! :) Take care, – Riana ⁂  08:54, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Regarding those lists - I wouldn't recommend AfD for List of Chinese inventions. I think it's important to note the influence of ancient Chinese science on modern-day science, and I don't think it would get deleted at AFD on that merit. As for American inventions, that's probably a bit more iffy. However, lists tend to survive AfD in general, and arguments around them can get very interesting! I probably haven't got enough experience in this area to help you out, sorry. However, an interesting read is Articles for deletion/Precedents - that might prove to be enlightening. It may be worth going to the respective portals and asking for help. I have deletionist tendencies but strongly disagree with the view that if an article can't be improved, it should be deleted - who knows, those lists might prove very useful with some referencing and cleanup.
 * The problem with a lot of articles about smaller places in India (probably other countries too, but I honestly haven't looked) is that small things get blown out of proportion - "famous families", "well known shops" - and the articles lose perspective. I sometime radically stubbify such articles, right down to the bare facts - geography, anything historically notable. I haven't received any complaints yet ;) If there has been only one person working on the article, it might be worth dropping them a note about notability, etc.
 * SpuriousQ's answered the questions, but I assume s/he'll accept before the RfA is transcluded onto the main RfA page - that's when the discussion begins.
 * No problem. You have some more stuff to look at on your coaching page. I'm confident you'll handle it like a pro. Take care, – Riana ⁂  09:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Commitment
Template:User_committed_identity —Preceding unsigned comment added by cyberoidx (talk • contribs)
 * Worth a closer read, although I think my password is secure enough. xC | ☎  05:13, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Zakirbooks.jpg
Hello Xcentaur, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Zakirbooks.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Xcentaur/Sandbox. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:34, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

admin coaching
You have an answer! And yeah, let's keep it to the questions section on the page, or you can use User talk:Xcentaur/Admin coaching - whatever you like. I'm trying to think of some more questions for you now! – Riana ⁂  10:23, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Argh, sorry, I totally forgot to have a look at the page in the past 2 days - I'll look now. Thanks for the reminder :) – Riana ⁂  07:19, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Stephanie McMahon
Thanks! I'm always happy to know when my edits are appreciated. Nikki311 20:40, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Love your sigbox
AfD differences aside, I do like your signature box - the phone character is very cool. LaughingVulcan 21:34, 20 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks :) xC | ☎  04:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Images
hmmm... m planning to work on the images section now.. cleanup and all, its got a BIG backlog, and even if i was superfast, i cant clear the entire thing because of copyright issues and stuff... anyways, how was CET? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberoidx (talk • contribs)


 * Physics ruined me... chem was good, maths got a bit screwy... howd yours go? xC | ☎  05:26, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * lol, ditto I just wish i'm in IIT now... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberoidx (talk • contribs)


 * LOL, sure you're gettin in? I'm clearing maths for sure, chem probably too... but physics is the bane of my existence... physics has been khafaa with me for way too long .... :P xC |  ☎  05:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Remember that user who's page i had ripped ? She's come back again and changed my pages, calling adding credits to herself a minor fix. I had already given her credits on the template using the noinclude tag, but she prefers to tell everyone that i have ripped the page, when i asked her to stop doing it, she added a section to her userpage called People who have copied my theme and added my name to it. Dont know if that is considered as an attack. I managed to save entire convo (which is humourous at times, see Real96 Archives and comment here, i'll check back :)  Cyberoid    X   14:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Look, you're wasting time. You are here to improve an encyclopedia. This is not a social networking site. Your reputation as an editor will not be established by having a snazzy userpage and zilch to show for productive edits.
 * Clearly this isnt an editor who lets little scratches go. If its so much of an issue, just empty out your page, put an under construction sign and redesign. Be original, be creative, be individualistic. Let this nonsense over two bits of Wiki Code go.
 * Spend your time on editing mainspace, not userspace, bro. Its not worth the trouble. Cheers! xC | ☎  16:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * its all fixed now, it was just the fact that someone comes to my page and credits herself happily, and repeatedly which made me hyper, anyways, we managed to come to a solution, or so i think :)  Cyberoid    X   05:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Good for you. Tell me, which pages are you working on now? Or are you working on the image backlog? xC | ☎  09:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Welcoming Newbies, vandal warnings, Checking Newbie edits, Speedy'ing useless New pages, and converting bar graphs to svg. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberoidx (talk • contribs)

hi

 * editor was referring to a faulty tag on his talk page, which I removed and dropped a note explaining that

hi, i got a message from you. thanks for doing the needful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ab 18 (talk • contribs)


 * Anytime. Happy editing! xC | ☎  14:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
I wanted to say thanks for the kind words about the essay on my user page. It's good to know that someone else feels the way I do about this place -- enormous, sprawling, and often dysfunctional, and yet overall, it's working. Keep fighting the good fight! &mdash; Catherine\talk 19:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey
Isn't pay important? I have a reference for Rani's salary for one movie but shshsh wouldn't let me put it in. I just have it put like in Julia Roberts page. There's no comparison or approximation. There's nothing written about highest-paid or compared to any other actress. It's just a number. There's nothing wrong with that, right? But shshsh just thinks it's wrong for no apparent reason, please talk to him. It just says she was paid this amount of money for one particular movie. There's nothing wrong with that. Thanks. -shez_15


 * There is a problem, actually. Firstly, these apparent facts aren't confirmed by the actress' manager or the actress herself, and are mainly hearsay or well-educated guesses. Neither is appropriate for an encyclopedia article. Secondly, there is no requirement to list how much she got for doing a particular movie. Thirdly, the Julia Roberts article has rubbish about friendships in the lead para, and is wholly unsourced. The article isn't at all a template for anything we should work towards. Only FA level articles should be considered guidance on what to have and what not to have in a respectable filmbio.
 * Regards, xC | ☎  07:10, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Removal of tags
REGARDING INTENTIONAL REMOVAL OF TAG, IT HAS NOT DONE INTENTIONALLY. SORRY FOR THAT. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mb2 pk (talk • contribs)


 * Ok, happy editing! xC | ☎  08:33, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

REGARDING THIS TOPIC, I WOULD LIKE TO TELL YOU THAT THESES FAMILIES ARE VERY FAMOUS IN THAT AREA AND ALL THESE FAMILIES ARE GAINTS OF THE AREA. FOR YOUR GUIDANCE, YOU CAN VISIT THE FOLLOWING LINK. http://www.world66.com/asia/southasia/pakistan/sadiqabad —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mb2 pk (talk • contribs)


 * Please put in those references wherever it is appropriate. Unsourced and unencyclopedic text must be removed. xC | ☎  08:37, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * You have edited that page. In fact, theres a line at the bottom stating Contributors May 26,2007 change by mb2_pk. Since you have entered this yourself, this is not a reliable source.
 * Also, a quick look at the members area reveals This. You have merely inserted the content you wanted to. That does not make the website a reliable source.
 * Thanks xC | ☎  08:41, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Hilal-e-Istaqlal
HILAL-E-ISTAQLAL WAS THE NOME OF AWARD WHICH WAS GIVEN TO THE CITIZENS OF LAHORE, SIALKOT AND SARGODHA ON THEIR BRAVERY BEHAVIOUR DURING THE 1965 PAKISTAN INDIA WAR. ITS A FLAG WHICH WAS GIVEN TO THEM. MOREOVER, THE IMAGE WHICH WAS LOADED BELONGS TO A POSTAGE STAMP ISSUED BY THE PAKISTAN POST OFFICE IN 1966. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mb2 pk (talk • contribs)


 * Perhaps. What would you like me to do about it? xC | ☎  08:42, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

I WANT THAT THIS TOPIC MUST BE INCLUDED IN YOUR ENCYCLOPEDIA AND IF OTHER PEOPLE DOES NOT ANY OBJECTION, IT MUST BE REMAIN IN YOUR GREAT WEBSITE TOPICS —Preceding unsigned comment added by mb2_pk (talk • contribs)


 * Is it really that difficult to sign using four tildes?
 * From whatever I see on your talk page, you made the page and it was subsequently deleted. The AfD was Articles for deletion/Hilal-e-Istaqlal. Theres nothing more to be done about, recreation of the article would likely lead to speedy deletion unless you could prove that you have reliable sources, some assertion of notability and rewritten the article as per NPOV. Thanks xC | ☎  08:54, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

HOW CAN I ADD MY SIGNETURES? LET TELL ME STEP BY STEP PROCESS BECAUSE I CANNOT UNDERSTAND THAT HOW CAN BE IT POSSIBLE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by mb2_pk (talk • contribs)


 * On wikipedia, we refer to signatures as your identification when you leave a comment on an article or user talk page. To sign use four tildes - ~ . If you can't find the tilde character on your keyboard, or it is unavailable, you can copy it from here - ~
 * If you copy paste those four tildes onto a talk page or user page, your username and a timestamp will be substituted. For example, when I use the four tildes, it produces this - xC | ☎  09:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC).
 * There is a relevant policy on this topic, please follow the link to Signatures
 * Regards, xC | ☎  09:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:BahawalPurCentralLibrary.JPG
REGARDING THIS, I WOULD LIKE TO INFORM YOU THAT ITS NOT MY CREATION I HAVE JUST UPLOADED THE PICTURE FROM THE WEB AND I HAVE NEVER CLAIMED THAT THIS IS MY CREATION. THIS PICTURE HAVE BEEN TAKEN FROM THE WEB AND AS FOR I REMEMBER, IT HAS NOT ANY COPY RIGHT OR LICESENCE


 * If there is no stated copyright, it is possible that it is copyrighted by the website you took it from. Further clarification would be neccessary by the person who originally took the picture. xC | ☎  09:11, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:BahawalPurBaghdadUlJadeedRailwayStation.JPG
THIS IMAGE WAS ALSO TAKEN FROM THE WEBSITE AND HAS NOT NOMINATED FOR ANY COPY RIGHT


 * Don't get what you mean. If its copyright status is unclear, sooner or later it will be tagged as such, not to worry. xC | ☎  09:13, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:HILAL-E-ISTAQLAL1a.jpg & Image tagging for Image:HILAL-E-ISTAQLAL2.jpg
THESE IMAGES WERE A POSTAGE STAMP ISSUED BY PAKISTAN POST OFFICE ISSUED IN 1966.


 * Erm, good. Why are you telling me this? xC | ☎  09:17, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

OMG
First of all, calm down no need to get out of proportions.

Please have a look on Rani's awards page. you can see this festival there too. Why should we write about Marocco in her page if we have that on the awards page?

The lenses in Black weren't been used to cover up her trademark greenish-brown eyes. It was to squint her eyes and make her strabismic.

This dress does not belong to the career section. We can put it in the humanitarian work section, and as it should be. Best Regards, --Shshshsh 09:30, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

I also think that the Toronto film festival is unnecessary. She didn't attend it at all. Why should we write about Festival where she didn't even take part in. What do you think? --Shshshsh 09:42, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

You know what? I also think you just intensively don't want to considerate in my edits. When I said that we have to remove all the design descriptions from her page, you disagreed. When Pa_7 said that, you didn't say nothing. Am I wrong? --Shshshsh 09:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * When I removed the film festival bit from Zinta's page you objected. Why the double standards?
 * Do you have a ref for the lenses being used to make her eyes strabismic (what does that mean by the way)?
 * This series of edits I agree with. I disagree with the logic you have used about the lenses - I was going to remove them anyway, the reason you gave had no ref to back it up. I also disagree with you removing portions while labelling them simply 'other edits'. If theres anything else you'd like to clarify, drop me a line. xC | ☎  09:57, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * No, I think it's great to have film festivals and I really do. However, the Marocco one appears already words for words in the awards page. Why should we write about Marocco in her page if we have that on the awards page? If you think that there is nothing wrong by putting it there, it's fine by me. I'm not concerned.
 * And you didn't answer, what do you think about the Toronto? She didn't take part in this festival. So she was invited. So what? She didn't attend it at all.


 * I don't know if you saw Black (Which is a wonderful film BTW), but as a deaf-blind woman, it was required from her to be strabismic. I don't know if all the deaf-blinds are like this, but I know that these lenses were used for this purpose - to squint her eyes, and not to cover up her trademark greenish-brown eyes.


 * You agreed with my other edits, so thanks. Best Regards, --Shshshsh 10:18, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * You haven't clarified what strabismic is. Nor have you given any ref for this. Inspite of this, I'll take your word for this in good faith.
 * The rest is a non-issue now. I've agreed to your edits. Happy editing xC | ☎  10:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * LOL, I mean cross-eyed. I think it has to be removed at all. I'm not the one who has to find references for my claim. Shez has to find refs in which we can find a note about lenses. We don't have refs, so remove.--Shshshsh 10:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Precisely, I was going to remove it anyhow. Happy editing xC | ☎  10:30, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your comment! I am glad I was able to expand your vocabulary! I like to use lesser used words like stygian. It makes people work a little harder. Be well. bdelisle 09:07 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Appreciated :) xC | ☎  08:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Shahrukh Khan
Hi again,

Thanks for your level headed input on the above article my friend. Good to see neutrality still has supporters lol. Barn Star heading your way dude. --Raja 20:41, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the kind words :) xC | ☎  05:31, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Semi-Hit
Hi xC. Semi-Hit is a box office status, which stands between above average and Hit. As TRRP remained well in its fourth weak, its total gross has grown, and the status too, so now it's a semi-hit. The same as we have super hit or blockbuster. That's not a rocking success, and we don't know, if it dropped to 5%-10% in the next weak the status could drop also to average or below average, but now it stands on semi-hit status, which is a box office status in the full sense of the word. The final status has not been declared yet, but it's good to update the page with every new update from the official box office site of Indian cinema. I hope it was explained enough and you got the matter. Thanks, Best Regards, --Shshshsh 10:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Firstly, I know what a semi-hit is. I question whether the phrasing needed to be changed, or is it only per your own whims and fancies.
 * Second, it doesn't have a reference, its merely your own opinion until you put in a suitable ref. While I am willing to concede to the point of having a short line about how the film did, I refuse to allow the article to declare the status of the film without a valid reference.
 * Lastly, 'fared above average' is correct. Your addition is incorrect - you cannot fare a status.
 * Regards, xC | ☎  18:50, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Just a note, IBOS also refers to it as above average. Thought I'd point it out. Cheers! xC | ☎  19:52, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh my dear, I'm not speculating with facts... ibosnetwork is not official (although it's good) and it has not been updated for the last weak at all. Box Office India is the official. Have a look Please:


 * As per 11/05/07-17/05/07 in the little table you can see above average. However, if you look strictly on the big table (which is far more easy to notice, by the way) you will see clearly the following: "Is rock steady in Mumbai and Delhi. SEMI HIT". This was updated on 26th May 2007 19.00 IST. The newest update of Indian box office for now. CHEERS!!! --Shshshsh 22:04, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


 * PS: I see there is no sense in talking to you nicely since you poke fun at me again. --Shshshsh 22:04, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't see any note saying that This is the official site. In fact, as far as my knowledge goes, there is no official site for such verdicts/ratings/etc. Also, as far as my limited vocabulary goes, 'semi-hit' and 'above-average' allude to the same status. It is a difference in usage. Your addition was wrong in terms of grammar. In case of any further clarification, drop me a line on my talk page. Cheers! xC | ☎  05:06, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

So what can I do if you can't see that?! The first table: Box Office Report-26th May 2007 19.00 IST. Anyway, I don't care.

What do you think about the fact of Rani being listed among the top actresses of all times? In fact, there is no Indian actress who does not appear there. Have a look, click the ref and let me know what you think. I can add it to the pages of every other actress who appears there If it remains in Rani's page. There are more than 90 actresses. Best Regards. --Shshshsh 10:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

PS: Please don't write Cheers again. I find it somehow belittling. I think Regards or whatever is enough. You don't even have to bid farewell if you don't want. --Shshshsh 12:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Mmmm and thanks for rewriting a bit the Shadaab Khan article, which I created. I'll be happy if you look the Kundan Shah article, which I created too (If you want of course). Best Regards. --Shshshsh 13:25, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * It is still unofficial. There is absolutely no proof that is the official site for all the details of all the Bollywood movies.
 * That lead is slated for a rewrite anyhow. This mentality of yours do this, otherwise I will do that is tiresome. You've been warned for this as well, from what I see on your talk page. Do as you like - as long as you are productive in your edits, you can do as you please.
 * As for how I end my posts - thats up to me, not you to decide.
 * Cheers xC | ☎  15:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Just a note, I've completed the rewrite of the lead para of Rani Mukerji, which has been way overdue. Cheers! xC | ☎  16:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I asked you NOT to bid farewell by this! Why are you doing this? How dare you? I find it belittling, so what's the matter? why are you so irrespective? Best Regards. --Shshshsh 17:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * (edit conflict)If you could provide me with logical reasons why greeting someone with "Cheers!" is belittling them, I would be forever indebted to you. Take care, xC | ☎  17:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't have to provide nothing. I said cause I felt so. So you're doing so specifically. Why can't we behave nicely with each other? You could just tell me that you're not belittling me, and it's OK. I also think your last edits to Rani are great.


 * So what do you think about the Kundan Shah page? Did you look? I just thought, it's important to write more about film directors. I think you're great editor, dear. I really do. That's why I turned to you. If you have the time and if you want, please have a look. That would be nice if you agreed or disagreed with some points. If you decide to look, share your opinions with me. That's the first time I'm writing about film directors. Best Regards, --Shshshsh 18:10, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I looked over Kundan Shah just a moment ago. You've written it quite well. With references to back it up, I'm sure it could turn out to be a good article. Regards, xC | ☎  18:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks. By the way. I added the fact of the highest paid to Preity's page too, since it refers to her too. I hope this will not be a cause of wars between editors on the pages of Rani, Preity, Aishwarya and Kareena... Best Regards, --Shshshsh 18:24, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't go looking for wars, so I don't know what would cause them. Add whatever you think would be useful to the page. Happy editing, xC | ☎  05:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Automatic Peer Review
xC, I'd like to know more about Automatic Peer Review. Where can I find further information about that? How did you make your edits on Rani's page? According to what? It looks interesting, but I really have no idea. Zinta also has that, but I don't know, will the page be updated Automatically? I would be grateful to you if you could explain a bit. Best Regards, --Shshshsh 23:28, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Sure, bro. See this link for the automatic reviewer. It basically deals with stylistic issues, page layout, basics like that.
 * The other is Peer Review, such as the one done for Rani Mukerji. In this, some editor drops by the page, looks over it and offers suggestions to improve the page. It can be considered as community feedback for improvement.
 * The third way to get a review of the page is to drop a note on the talk page of some editor involved with Wikiproject Indian Cinema. They're busy people usually, but someone always drops by to help out.
 * Nope, none of these offers automatic changes as such. As editors, it is our responsibility to improve the page. The automatic peer review is automatic in the sense no editors are directly involved in it. But all changes on a page have to be done by the editors who look over the page, no script can do that.
 * Hope that helps, xC | ☎  05:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Wow I have no words! Thanks dear, thank you very much. It helped a lot:), Best Regards, --Shshshsh 06:53, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * You're welcome :) xC | ☎  06:54, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Username
See Aelfthryth. Aelfthrytha 06:16, 29 May 2007 (UTC)