User talk:Xdj70s

A tag has been placed on CLK Video Productions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 05:03, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sugarcult has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCa_cXZSS-0. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:16, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Cut N' Dry Talent Radio for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cut N' Dry Talent Radio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cut N' Dry Talent Radio until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:53, 1 November 2011 (UTC)


 * So, there are several issues. 1) Based on your comment on my talk page, I think you may have a WP:Conflict of Interest. 2) Your podcast must establish WP:Notability That would be coverage of your podcast in good 3rd party sources (newspapers, magazines, tv shows, etc.) Possibly other podcast mentions - but as podcasts generally fail WP:Reliability you may have issues there. Regarding other podcasts, that falls under WP:OtherStuff. Basically the fact that something else slipped through the cracks does not mean it is ok. If someone notices the other podcasts, they too should be deleted. Finally, there is some leeway in this. If the podcast is "deemed" notable by the editor, (Ie, they think it is famous enough even without references), then they might not mark it for deletion. That is really something that is up to each editor to decide. Once someone decides it should be discussed, it goes into an articles for deletion discussion, where many editors can get together and develop consensus. (You are welcome to join that discussion).However, your best bet to keep the article is to find good WP:Reliability references.


 * The article is moved from your user page to a sandbox: User:Xdj70s/sandbox. Drmies (talk) 18:07, 1 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Response from my talk page - I marked your article for deletion very quickly, that is true. There is a tool that editors can use to watch pages get created which I use. The conflict of interest is more for people directly involved with the topic, in my opinion a fan would not be covered. However, even the owner/self can edit the article, it just raises eyebrows and flags, and makes people look at the article more closely. Fame cannot be used as a criteria for proving notability, but if it was well known to a particular editor, they may choose not to enforce other policies as hard. Ultimately notability does need to be proven - just because one editor let it slip does not mean the next wont tag it in a few minutes. . In the case of a podcast, it would involve probably being widely cited by blogs or other podcasts, in depth reviews, or optimally magazine/newspaper/tv mentions. Obliviously only the most famous podcasts would meet that last part of the criteria. Gaijin42 (talk) 20:25, 1 November 2011 (UTC)