User talk:Xenarc

October 2019
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:44, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

No one is shouting. ITS JUST FRUSTRATING THAT PEOPLE BLOCKING ME DON'T EVEN DO THEIR HOMEWORK
 * Using capital letters is considered shouting and is rude. Please stop doing so. WP:GAB will help you understand how to craft an acceptable unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 17:18, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Why do I need to do all this madness just to get unblocked. Wikipedia really is losing valuable information missing from its pages because of people like you. CAPITAL LETTERS ARE RUDE???? WOW.. .ARE YOU THE PRESIDENT OF WIKIPEDIA?? EMOTIONS PLAY A PART HERE?????? WHAT MADNESS?@!!!!!!! YOU PEOPLE ARE GIVEN TOO MUCH POWER TO JUST BAN ANYONE IT IS RIDICULOUS>

You were warned. Talk page access revoked. This leaves you with WP:UTRS. I strongly suggest you read WP:GAB and WP:COI before making a request there. --Yamla (talk) 17:23, 25 October 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 17:37, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

--Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:24, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Existence is not enough to warrant mention on Wikipedia. A company must be notable to be considered worthy of inclusion. Lack of a standalone article is reason enough to exclude it from any list.
 * 2) We consider evidence from reliable sources that are independent of the company to judge if it is worthy of inclusion.
 * 3) Wikipedia is not interested in what a company's representatives want to say about it. Readers expect neutral articles, written independently of their subject and sourced reliably, not corporate promotional pieces.
 * 4) Your account name violates Wikipedia's username policy, which disallows accounts from being named after companies or organizations. Accounts are meant to be accessed by and represent a single individual.
 * 5) Even if your company meets the notability criteria, you are discouraged from writing about it due to the inherent conflict of interest it presents. You would also have to abide by the mandatory paid editing disclosure policy.
 * 6) If an article about this company is ever accepted, at no time will you or anyone else have ownership or exclusive control over its contents. Articles are editable by anyone, and can change substantially over time. Consensus is Wikipedia's fundamental editorial model.
 * 7) Editors are expected to behave civilly and engage in calm, rational discussion. Emotional outbursts (like the above lashing out in anger) is disruptive and can lead to sanctions.