User talk:Xho

BEdita
Thanks for your email; however, the normal means for communication is posting on talk pages, so my reply is here.

I'm an administrator, so I can delete pages. If I had thought it worthy of deletion, I wouldn't have removed the template; I would have deleted it right then. I'm not entirely sure that it meets notability standards, but as I know very little about open source software, I'm not going to presume either that it does or that it doesn't. Thanks for your kind words! Nyttend (talk) 17:49, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

from Xho to  Nyttend
Hi Nyttend,

Thank you. As you may argued I am not that kind of spammer and I have used my own user (registered years ago) to post the page.

Strangely on Wikipedia IT they removed the page quickly so much that I had noticed only after it was already done.

I wrote to the italian administrators in order to have a kind discussion on this issue.

Thank you very much for your answer, and sure, I will write on this talk page if needed.

Xho (talk) 10:39, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of BEdita
Hello Xho, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, BEdita, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Rlevse. This has been done because the page is a blatant advert that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add " " to the page text, and edit the to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Rlevse. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 06:23, 27 March 2010 (UTC)