User talk:Xia888

The authority did not punish the criminals but punish the unaccountable victim (Drunk-driving)
Drunk-driving behind the curtain (Unfair)

I: Yes accidents? Or deliberate? On four o��clock forty on the afternoon of November 13th, 1998, at the place one meter west from the center of the crossing of a road junction, less than 200 meters from the north of Liaoyuan City Mining Bureau General Hospital, where (it is said by the criminal that) the visibility was two to three hundred meters and had good sight and open zone, because Xu Shaoqi, a resident of Sun Rising Rural of Lighthouse Village in Xi��an District, Liaoyuan City, was drunk driving and over speeding and driving conversely (according to the fact that the victim did not have traces that showed being hit on his body and the position of the hitting point on the body of the bike, it can be proved that Xu was truly driving conversely on the left driveway. This fact has been testified.) when the two speeding Ji D-50813 South 125 B-side two-wheel motorcycles hit my older sister Xia Lianqun (hereinafter referred to as the victim) who was passing the road normally pushing a bike and bumped her far to more than ten meters, Xu did not take any measures and looked on with folded arms. His subjective hostility is evident. He deliberately dragged on for nearly one hour and then sent the victim to the hospital which is only two hundred meters away from the crime scene. Because the lunatic criminal wished the victim died and deliberately dragged on without aids for the victim the victim died from the excessively bleeding. Xu Shaoqi knew clearly that the victim could die if he gave no curing measures. His subjective hostility is one important element of murder. Traffic accident and giving no aids are in the same process of Xu Shaoqi��s crime. The main reason of victim��s death is that Xu did not adopt necessary curing measures.

II: Accident disposal authority evaded laws The authority did not punish the criminals but punish the unaccountable victim (forcibly imposed responsibilities on her). The perpetrator hit the pedestrian but got no punishment! Why are the two serious peccancies of after drink and over speed written into the Road Traffic Accident Advisor? Why to amerce the dead victim? In traffic accident, there are four circumstances under which the party will not be punished according to the regulation: 'the third one is that if the party dies in the accident, the party will not be charged with the penal and administration responsibility. That is whether the party has peccancies in the accident and whether the party has responsibility for the accident, he will not be given penal or administration sanctions.' In Nov. 30, 1998, the professional executing authority the accident disposal unit of Liaoyuan City traffic police detachment (hereinafter referred to as the accident unit) issued the NO. 2110153 Road Traffic Accident Responsibility Cognizance which says that the accident perpetrator drove speeding after drinking and made the victim die. But the authority deliberately exculpated for the criminal and unlawfully judged that the criminal should take the subordinate responsibility and forcibly imposed on the decedent in the accident main responsibility and gave the victim one hundred Yuan penalty according to the NO.2110153 Road Traffic Accident Responsibility Cognizance. The accident unit officiates in deputy of the nation. The head of the accident unit Zhang said, The responsibility partition of the accident is studied and made by our whole community The third item of the thirty-third article in Constitution of the People's Republic of China writes the nation respects and ensures human rights. The police department defied and trampled human rights and forcibly imposed responsibility on the victim and gave the victim penalty of one hundred Yuan.

III: After the accident the accident unit dealt with the case collectively. It is the accident unit that released the criminal. On the second day after the accident, the head of accident unit Zhang and other two people came to the Liaoyuan City Mining Bureau General Hospital (note: I was hit by Audi car of the head of Anshu Mine of Liaoyuan City Dongliao County in 1997 and had to accept cure in hospital because of the left leg tibial fracture. the bad skills of the doctor caused a nonunion of my leg. The hospital colluded with the mine head and misguided me that my leg was healed and forcibly transacted the procedures for leaving hospital without my consent, which led to my second operation. Because my sister��s case has not finished and I was put into prison for reeducation through labor, the case of Anshu Mine traffic accident economic compensation is discontinued on the court of first instance), and lied to us, 'the perpetrator escaped from our accident unit. We sent three troops of people but did nit catch him.' On the same day in the accident unit, Zhang said the perpetrator did not have the ability to compensate and asked us to negotiate with the dependents of the perpetrator about the compensation. He tried not to lawfully investigate the criminal��s penal responsibility and finish the penal case personally. I clearly expresses on the spot, 'the perpetrator has no money. We may accept none of the compensation of more than 38,900 Yuan. But the perpetrator committed a crime and he must receive punishment and be put into prison for the period he deserves. But Zhang said to us, you are too fractious to return unless you get a lesson. At last you will be hurt badly and come back to beg them on kneels.'

IV: Illegal System The person who investigates this case in the Traffic Police Brigade didn��t allow my lawyer to peruse the paper; he said that Their authorities didn��t allow us to peruse the paper. It is obvious that the system has flaws during handling the case, disobeying the legal principle.

V: Not handing over the criminal case The Traffic Police Brigade disobeyed the facts and law deliberately. They counterfeited materials, concealed the state of affairs, played tricks, changed the nature of the criminal case, set criminals free on purpose and refused to hand over the case to he judicatory organ. They have violated the Article eleven in Provisions on the Procedures for Road Traffic, which content is 'If it is needed to give criminal sanction to the person who is responsible for the traffic accident, the person should be handed over to the judiciary. '

People��s Procuratorate of Jilin Province connived and took sides of the Public Administrative Enforcement of Law Organization and People��s Procuratorate of Liaoyuan City, so I have to appeal to the higher authorities for ten years since 1998. Due to that, I (the brother of the victim) was detained for twice and had a labor education for once, which is I was forced to be detained on May 30th, 2004. (If you want to condemn somebody, you can always trump up a charge)

Can they not pay one��s life. To sum up, after the case happening, the Public Security Department and the Traffic Police Brigade played tricks, freed the criminal, made the unreal evidence, prevented the lawyer to peruse the paper, hided the truthful facts, broke the division responsibility law, forced the responsibility and imposed a fine to the dead victim, and then they counterfeited the material and changed the nature of the criminal case. I have nothing to wish only hope the related department finish the case earlier, and give the victim a fair, reasonable and justice statement. Let the victim have his bones buried.

China: Liaoyuan City, Jilin Province

Brother of Victim: Xia Yuanfeng

Read more:

Primitive evidence: