User talk:Xiantec

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:09, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ram Chandra (Babuji) has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ram Chandra (Babuji). Thanks! Kaizenify (talk) 07:18, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ram Chandra (Babuji) has been accepted
 Ram Chandra (Babuji), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Ram_Chandra_(Babuji) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Kaizenify (talk) 07:24, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jay Chaudhry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you Bot :), corrected the mistake. Xiantec (talk) 07:37, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kanha Shanti Vanam, you may be blocked from editing. ''This article is, frankly, spam, and there is no informational content here that is not in the target article. Again, do not edit articles about SRCM directly. bonadea'' contributions talk 09:06, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Hi, it appears funny to me, you made a [big change] in Kanha Shanti Vanam without any discussion, which [I reverted], requesting not to change without discussion and now you are saying I am making disruptive editing and I should discuss the matter on the talk page :). After my repeated requests [here], you are not answering where is the COI in my user page. Now if I don't know where the COI is, how do you expect me to learn and change anything? What's really a bad experience for me is that you are putting COI tag everywhere, making big changes without discussion, not giving straight answer why you think there is COI and now even threatening me to block. I am at loss here, is this how Wikipedia works? Is this how experienced users in Wikipedia treat new users? Maybe it was not such a good idea to keep making donations to Wikimedia organization all these years ... I am beginning to think. You might be really a busy user, so may not have time to reply, but thank you though for sharing some links for getting help from other experts, let me explore that. Xiantec (talk) 20:00, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I apologise if I gave the impression that your conflict of interest is due to the text you used to have on your user page. You have a conflict of interest because you are closely connected to the SRCM – surely that is not such an obscure rule. That means you have to stick to the policies for editing with a conflict of interest. As for donations, I think you will find that nobody cares one way or another – if you personally think it is a good cause to support, go for it, and if you don't, don't do it. --bonadea contributions talk 20:03, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, please don't apologies, I was a bit frustrated failing to understand the COI cause hence vented out. I am learning by the way where my edits might have been problematic w.r.t NPOV and trying to correct them, but I would have appreciated if the pointing out of the problems would have been in a more civil manner as opposed to a direct blame and punitive action of COI tag and a threat to block. I am guessing that you being an expert user see many such users in this platform and perhaps deal with them on a daily basis and since I am very familiar with Media Wiki syntax as we have used it at work, my edits might be coming across to you as by an expert Wikipedia user, however when it comes to knowledge of Wikipedia policies I still have to learn a lot. Anyways, I will seek independent view on COI. Xiantec (talk) 13:32, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. MER-C 11:59, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

I'll also simplify this for you in that, if you have a conflict of interest, you should start by explaining what it is, and how your future edits will be consistent with that policy. 331dot (talk) 19:38, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Comment to the reviewing administrator: Feel free to contact me if you have questions about the COI issues (which, I notice, have not really been addressed in the unblock request). --bonadea contributions talk 12:44, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, I would appreciate if you would tell me also more about the COI issue. For several months you kept saying it's a COI because I had declared it in my user page, then recently you changed the reason to "you are closely connected to SRCM". For a long time I have been asking for clarification in simple terms, referring to relevant Wikipedia policies, so I can learn and adhere to those policies, but instead of giving a clear and straightforward answer, you got me blocked indefinitely with the help of admin. Yes I practice Heartfulness Meditation and I know about this organization quite well, does this fact qualifies for a COI? I thought this qualifies me to add real encyclopedic information on the topic as a subject matter expert . I have no intention to add any content for promotion purposes, if I added then it was unintentional and out of inexperience. For such content, by all means please remove it and you are welcome to chide me also, but I expected a civil discussion and guidance as opposed to accusations and indefinite block. Xiantec (talk) 06:14, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Email request
Hi Xiantec, you sent me an email requesting guidance on how to get unblocked. First, there's no reason to send an email, you could have simply pinged me here on your talk page with your request. Second, I can't really offer anything more that what offered in their response to your unblock request. When you have persistent issues with is deemed unconstructive, you must first understand how what you did was incorrect. It's fine to try and explain your actions, but the bottom line is you have to understand and admit you were wrong. I can't speak to the exact activity or activities which got you blocked, other than in a general sense. You appear to have a close connection with a company/organization. Therefore, you must stay away from editing those articles. Period. If I were in your shoes, I wouldn't even make suggestions for edits on the talk pages of those articles. Just simply stay away from them. WP is not an advertising platform, and COI and UPE editors are of great concern to the project. But as I said, NinjaRobotPirate's suggestions are the best course of action you could take.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:44, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for replying. I did ping you actually, if you see the last line above my signature in my previous request to unblock. I am not sure if that's the correct way to ping or not. Since I didn't get your attention and the request got declined as a procedural decline due to inactivity for more than 2 weeks, I sent an email to you. Anyways, thanks for your guidance. Xiantec (talk) 13:14, 31 January 2021 (UTC)