User talk:Xinconnu

Gone daddy gone.

Proposed deletion of TMI Mudlib


The article TMI Mudlib has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced, Unnotable mudlib

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spigot Who?  13:49, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of MSQL-JDBC


The article MSQL-JDBC has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This JDBC interface for mSQL was probably never independently notable; now that mSQL itself is now only of historical importance, there is no reason to have a separate article - especially one containing so little information as this. (JDBC drivers are invariably written in Java. An mSQL driver will naturally use the mSQL protocols. If the obvious was removed from the article, what would be left?)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thparkth (talk) 01:30, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Mauritania
Please don't revert again today, see wP:3RR. I take your point and will be trying to deal with the editor who is clearly edit-warring. Dougweller (talk) 06:31, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:EnStratusLogo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:EnStratusLogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Enstratius


A tag has been placed on Enstratius, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. § FreeRangeFrog croak 05:14, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of TMI Mudlib


The article TMI Mudlib has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. It had no meaningful hits in a Google Books search or searches of other major databases.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar 22:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lima Mudlib


The article Lima Mudlib has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. It had no meaningful hits in a Google Books search or searches of other major databases.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar 22:11, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:LPMud mudlibs has been nominated for deletion
Category:LPMud mudlibs has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. czar 21:04, 25 October 2020 (UTC)