User talk:Xinit/Archive 1

Hi there Xinit. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for the info on hardcore punk and on Canada. I hope you like it here and stick around. If you want, you can drop us a note at New user log to introduce yourself.

If you need editing help, visit How does one edit a page. For format questions, visit our manual of style. You can use the Show preview button before you save, to make sure your edits do what you intended.

You can sign your name on talk pages by using " " for your username and " ~ " for your username and a timestamp.

Some time when you're bored, you can read through our policies and guidelines.

If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. You can also drop me a question on my talk page.

Happy editing, Isomorphic 00:56, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia Xinit. I noticed that on the Sex toy article, you linked a number of things in your "link, link, link" edit, but the things you linked are all redirect pages back to the Sex toy article itself, like Anal beads for instance, were you planning to write longer articles for these things? If not I'll revert your link, link, link edit back. Just wondering, a simple error no harm, no foul, happy editing, and agian Welcome to Wikipedia! --Flockmeal 04:26, Apr 14, 2004 (UTC)

EL to ROIR
Please read [WP:VAND]. I read the article you suggested and I get your poorly made point. Now you will stop overreacting and leave me alone, as we are done. --Nick (talk) 16:03, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Nardwuar
Hey...you know Nardwuar? That's pretty cool. I'm not sure where I got the thing about Sum 41, I must have misremembered something. Adam Bishop 22:44, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

RHCP
Thanks for doing the revert on that Philosophy section... I was going to let it sit for a couple hours before I'd have reverted myself - mostly to avoid a revert fight. Xinit 00:39, 19 May 2006 (UTC)


 * No problem, same thing happened to me yesterday. The POV has been freaking driving me up the wall. maxcap 00:43, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

If you are going to remove the film/tv, insisting they should be in the band member's pages instead, then why not add them to those individual pages instead of just removing them from the RHCP page? --Mattarata 14:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Something Green and Leafy
What makes you nominate Something Green And Leafy This Way Comes for speedy deletion and not the other half-dozen album stubs I created for this same band?


 * Because it was a very short article providing little or no context (CSD A1)
 * Because I didn't notice the other stubs.
 * Because, in your hurried cut-and-paste, you couldn't even be bothered to match the article title with the first sentence of the so-called stub.

--Calton | Talk 04:46, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Holy Shiite
At the times that I deleted it, the article had no text whatsoever. That means it was empty. User:Zoe|(talk) 19:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Randists
About what you said on my talk page: I do use the term Randist, but not as a personal attack. The term is meant to be an "unloaded" term to replace the loaded term "Objectivists". It isn't a matter of insulting, but a matter of using neutral terminology. I do this not to insult anyone, but to make sure nobody - whether it's them or me - is insulted when refering to their ideology. -- LGagnon 15:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah... it strikes me as an odd approach aimed at silencing opposition. I'm mostly curious what the "attacks" are in your statements, as I do not see it.  Perhaps it's like the Star Trek fans who don't like being called "Trekkies"? -- Xinit 15:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Re:RHCP EL
Honestly, I'm kind of conflicted as well. It is ad heavy, and tour dates aren't absolutely necessary as part of a biography, but I was hoping that kind of fluff might help placate the fanboys (but it probably won't) maxcap 19:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments
I appreciate your help with disputes, but it's best if you post comments for others to their own talk pages, as they are not likely to look at comments on my talk page. Thanks. -- LGagnon 20:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Cult category
Oh, I know it'll anger them; I'm just not concerned if I anger them or not, given that they will vandalize and make personal attacks anyways. -- LGagnon 21:39, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Touth
excuse me why are you getting involved in all this? you are really not helping are you? i am really not happy at all! and why are you getting everyone to look at my user page huh? Touth 02:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

i just dont like what you put on that talk page. if you dont want me to get rid of it then i want you to get rid of it. now leave me alone....sob....sob....Touth 04:02, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I won't listen to you and get rid of it, because you won't listen to anyone. --Xinit 04:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

and why did you call me a puppy?


 * I didn't... go read that again. --Xinit 04:39, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Green Day citations
I've been planning to add citations for a while, and I've done some preliminary work before. A good bet if you want to verify stuff is to check out fansites, which tend to reprint full articles. If they provide the appropriate info (author, title, date, publication, etc.) those can be added as references. WesleyDodds 01:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

CoTW
You might want to personally ask members of the Alternative Wikiproject to check out and contribute to the COTW page, particularly asking them if there's anything they might wnat to nominate to work on. WesleyDodds 00:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

FLA
Thanks! Oh, and I don't know if you started thoses pages on the newer FLA albums, but I think the infoboxes are supposed to be orange. Let me know what you think! The-dissonance-reports 03:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

PS - You seem to have a lot of experiences with external links...I've worked pretty hard on the page for the industrial band X Marks the Pedwalk, maybe you could take a look at that section of the page? :) I'm more concerned with the references section than anything!  The-dissonance-reports 03:43, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Re:Check This
Hilarious. He's a passionate guy, you've got to give him that. maxcap 19:30, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Maybe just coincidence maxcap 21:05, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

I Am Spoonbender
I thought it might be. That's why I added the notability tag and not the speedy delete one. Good luck with the writing. Cheers, Augustus Rookwood 21:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I've tried adding a little bit to the IAS article. Maybe I can add a bit more sometime in the future, since I think they deserve it, but I work glacially slow and am trying to fight a computer addiction, so... well... I probably won't accomplish much. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 02:32, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Voltaire name section
What? Why on Earth have you removed it? It is relevent, and sourced. It deserves a place in the article, whether or not his real name has been revealed. On the other hand, it will need editing now his real name has been revealed- as I say, I am the only person reguarly editing it, and I haven't really had the motivation to do anything with it for a while. J Milburn 20:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, cool, I'll leave you to it then. All's well that ends well! I will join you in the cleanup process at some point, but not now. J Milburn 20:29, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

'Real proof' of Voltaire's name
I am not quite sure what you mean. I honestly can't think of a better source for his real name, short of government documents. This is the only employment he is under in which he is not 'Voltaire', and so the only reliable (public access) place we can find his name. What are you proposing? J Milburn 22:13, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

multi dimensional awareness
it means that the kids can see into ( well, see into is a simplified example) other realities, other earths where humans (or at least human like things) live the idea stems from that they are sometimes thought to come from other realities...( i been reading a lot)Charred Feathers 01:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

NPOV tags to Structural Integration and Rolfing
Hi Xinit, you recently added tags to the above two articles. The tags include a statement and a request,"The neutrality of this article or section is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page." I look forward to you beginning the discusions mentioned as at present your reasons for the tags are not indicated in your edit summs or on the discussion pages. SmithBlue

Oops
Good catch on ghost hunting. . I slipped up there. Thank you. --TS 16:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Rolfing
I need to understand why you keep removing the edits I keep making. This needs to be on the Rolfing page: Only graduates of the Rolf Institute can be referred to as Rolfers, Certified Rolfers and Advanced Certified Rolfers. I have stopped trying to enforce the service marks. But we legally own these terms and the public needs to know that when the term Rolfer is used, it is just not anyone who has gone through structural integration training - like at the Guild or Hellerwork.

I could do this another way. I could add it to the sentence "The term Rolfing is a registered trademark of the Rolf Institute of Boulder Colorado." to become "The terms Rolfing and Rolfer are a registered trademark of the Rolf Institute of Boulder Colorado." Would that be better?

Please tell me your complaint so I can add what I need to legally without it being removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.16.184.186 (talk) 22:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Canadian hardcore punk
I've started an article on Canadian hardcore punk if you're interested in helping. ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 14:07, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Death Race2000 Album.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Death Race2000 Album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Corporate Whores.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Corporate Whores.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC)