User talk:Xirox003

Welcome!
Hi Xirox003! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:40, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Dengvaxia controversy
You have recently removed independently-cited information from this article, claiming it to be false information. Since the material is properly sourced, you'll need to discuss your thoughts about its veracity at the article's talk page. Be prepared to show equally reliable sources that refute the sources cited in the article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:40, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Dengvaxia controversy—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:16, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dengvaxia controversy. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Dengvaxia controversy, you may be blocked from editing.   Galebazz (talk) 15:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for inconvenient but the reference that you giving to the people are false information to your reaction what kind of reference is that.

PAO is helping to poor people why they calling them corrupt? ABS CBN is a bias news channel why not check other channel? Have you check the manila times, bulgar, gma, and un tv reference about the dengvaxia contraversy? This sanofi kill those children they inject the vaccine and the announce delay for side effects what kind of professionalism is that? Killing childrens as guinea pig? What kind of system is this giving false information to the people. Xirox003 (talk) 22:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Instead of edit warring and consistently removing content, you should bring these concerns up at the talk page of the article instead. If you have a legitimate concern we can resolve it but brute forcing your view is not the correct way to do it. Galebazz (talk) 06:21, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dengvaxia controversy. SunDawn talk  00:23, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dengvaxia controversy. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

You don't seem to be listening
Your editing at Dengvaxia controversy appears solely focused on removing the "reactions" and "allegations of corruption" sections from the article, in violation of Wikipedia's neutrality policy. You have been warned multiple times to cease your disruptive editing and to enter into a discussion of the matter at Talk:Dengvaxia controversy. Your continued disruption and failure to discuss will likely lead to a loss of editing privileges unless you change your approach. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:50, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, edit warring, and repeated copyright violations. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --Blablubbs (talk) 18:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)