User talk:Xjennersonx

I don't think you've explained why the band is notable
A tag has been placed on Alabaster music llc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. AndrewHowse 16:43, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

== I'm unsure what else you need me to put up to explain the notability of this band. I can't even edit the page now that it's been deleted.. this is irritating. Visit and go to the press section to see the "third parties" that have deemed the band notable. Thanks ==

Speedy deletion of Alabaster music llc
A tag has been placed on Alabaster music llc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 18:56, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Can anyone please just word things in plain English so I can build this page properly?

 * Have you had a chance to check out WP:Notability (music)?
 * Some of your reviewers might satisfy point 1 - in that case you need to cite them in the page. If the band has released any recordings, then that would help too.
 * btw, if you want to develop the page without constant scrutiny by interfering busybodies(!) then do it at User:Xjennersonx/Alabaster (band). That's part of your space, not the general encyclopedia (so-called mainspace) and doesn't have the same requirements for notability. Then just copy it to a new page, like Alabaster (band), when you're ready.
 * Leave me a message at User talk:AndrewHowse if I can help. --AndrewHowse 19:31, 20 September 2007 (UTC)


 * My pleasure. --AndrewHowse 20:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:AlabasterInKansas.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AlabasterInKansas.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 07:26, 19 July 2009 (UTC)