User talk:XlDooM~enwiki

Removal of You'll Have That PROD
I see you have removed the PROD tag from this article. Your stated reason in the edit summary was that "it DOES meet WP:WEB criterion 3: distributed by an online publisher." Could you explain this further? Criterion 3 reads: "The content is distributed via a site which is both well known and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster. The article itself must provide proof that its subject meets one of these criteria via inlined links or a "Reference" or "External link" section. ... Such distributions should be nontrivial." Since there is no "references" section to this article, could you point out which of the external links refelects a well-known, independent and non-trivial online publisher? -- Dragonfiend 09:11, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: You'll Have That
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem to me that You'll Have That meets these criteria, I have started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/You'll Have That. Don't forget to add four tildes (&lt;nowiki&gt;TeckWizBot 15:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)&lt;/nowiki&gt;) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, an administrator will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. -- Dragonfiend 00:04, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called XlDooM. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name XlDooM~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 03:55, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:39, 22 April 2015 (UTC)