User talk:Xlance

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! --Mcginnly | Natter 01:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Heliopolis style
Nice work on the new article, it's a great start. I think it would probably be better to list this article at Timeline of architectural styles (western)‎ rather than the modernarch - the template is used for less 'location specific' (ie. at least two or three national) styles. --Mcginnly | Natter 01:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I notice you have restored Heliopolis style to the Modernarch template - I would like to discuss this with you - The other 'styles' on that list are influential beyond their national boundaries - Is there evidence to suggest a similar claim for Heliopolis style? If there is then fine, it should stay - if there isn't, then there's no need for it to be included. I'd rather discuss this with you rather than you just reverting my edit without a summary. Many thanks. --Mcginnly | Natter 14:02, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi Xlance, I noticed you added Heliopolis style to the template again - I've opened a discussion at Template talk:Modernarch, I'd like to discuss it with you rather than keep reverting each other. Cheers. --Mcginnly | Natter 16:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Lighthouse at Alexandria
Xlance, I was wondering if you could send me the original CAD file of the light house, I have access to a 3D Printer and I would love to make a model and add it to our database, Wolff.RyanM@gmail.com

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Heliopolis style.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Heliopolis style.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 17:14, 10 December 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 17:14, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Heliopolis style.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Heliopolis style.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:11, 11 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:11, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:WordStar-MailMerge.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:WordStar-MailMerge.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 20 May 2016 (UTC)