User talk:Xleax

reference
Hello Xleax, I noticed your addition of a date of birth for Marianne Williamson. Do you have a reference for that? Thanks. Ste4k 19:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi. I'm not sure where to reply to you since I haven't done it before. My references are http://www.adze.com/Celebrities/MarianneWilliamson.htm

http://www.earthstarconsulting.com/aboutHDSarticle44.htm

kind of odd articles but they have the same date. Do i need to add a reference to a date of birth and place of birth?

Reply here is fine, and I did get your e-mail, Thanks! :) I'll go ahead and put them into the article. If you'd like to see how the templates are used, you can read about them at: WP:CTT. Thanks again. Ste4k 21:07, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

suggestion
Hi Xleax, you might want to make a userpage for yourself. Just click on the red "User Page" link. It doesn't have to say much, but, if you do, then your name will no longer be red-colored (eeeek!) :) You can read about User pages at WP:USER. Hope this helps. Ste4k 21:30, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Right, I shall start with a full stop :) Thanks for all the help man, I really appreciate it. Xleax 22:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi again.
Hi Xleax, About the reason that you cut out the statement in Marianne Williamson.. It doesn't matter if it seems POV to you, what matters is that we quote source that made the statement. If you go down into the references section for that statement and click on the URL, you will read the words for yourself. Please understand that I am not saying that you are wrong, but I am saying that according to policy we need to follow the guidelines. Another good thing to make sure is that if disagree with an existing article that you ask questions about it in the Discussion area of the article before making any changes to find out more about it. Hope this helps, and also, I have a gift for you:

Hope that helps! :) Ste4k 08:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Anže Kopitar
Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia by updating the statistics in. Unfortunately your recent edit(s) has been reverted. This is because the guidelines from the WikiProject on Ice Hockey states that season statistics may only be updated when the season has ended. This is for maintaining a high standard and accuracy on all hockey players articles on Wikipedia. We understand that your edit was in good faith and hope that you understand our objectives. If you have any questions, please visit us at the WikiProject on Ice Hockey's talk page. Krm500 19:58, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

I wasn't aware of the policy. Thank you. Xleax 21:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Infrastructure factual statement
I guess it has to be stated in a style that reads like an encuyclop... I've run into this in the past that common knowledge needs to be stated in a manner that makes it undistinbguishedChivista 20:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject football - taskforce Slovenia
Hi! I saw you made some articles on Slovenian football, therefore I ask you if you would support me in the creation of the Slovenia taskforce. If you agree please list your name here:WikiProject_Council/Proposals. Janisterzaj (talk) 15:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aleš Šmon
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Aleš Šmon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Article is unsourced and contains no assertion of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 05:45, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nik Omladič
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nik Omladič, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Article is unsourced and contains no assertion of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 05:46, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Xleax! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 8 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:14, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Sebastjan Čelofiga -
 * 2) Martin Steiner -
 * 3) Damjan Trifković -
 * 4) Denis Grbić -
 * 5) Alen Mujanovič -
 * 6) Alem Mujaković -
 * 7) Joviša Kraljevič -
 * 8) Aleš Šmon -

Proposed deletion of Kimberly Prendez


The article Kimberly Prendez has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * notability is not indicated; speedy delete might be appropriate as not even a claim of notability is made; IMdB entry indcates that she does NOT meet WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Griseum (talk) 03:58, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Martin Steiner


The article Martin Steiner has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league (no record of him at prvaliga.si) and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 13:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Tonight at Noon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tonight at Noon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tonight at Noon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY 2008 17:23, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A Dog Year


The article A Dog Year has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable film, does not meet WP:NF"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY 2008 14:32, 11 July 2018 (UTC)