User talk:Xloem

Disproof
1. The argument was not precisely so you did not figure out the counterargument. Said number is vague in on bit in the hypothetical attempted count, therefore not allowed, therefore ejected, causing the number derived from the new diagonal to not be vague in one bit, thus is in the set being counted (though not really, it's too wide). You are supposed to solve this problem, not language. We consider it unsolvable. GOD claims    he can do the count, but the diagonal is randomized so not algorithmic, and HE can't put the diagonal derived number(s) in intentionally only attempt to since it's mathematically impossible. In this case only he considers their argument false due to self reference.

The natural numbers greater argument is too vague to understand. In the future you must make your argument very clear, in standard mathematical form as near as practicable, and Absolutely without error. Victor Kosko (talk) 23:58, 10 October 2018 (UTC)