User talk:Xmandms

Welcome!

Hello, Xmandms, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to University of Health Sciences Antigua does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! SGMD1 Talk/Contribs 23:12, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

August 2012
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to University of Health Sciences Antigua. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SGMD1 Talk/Contribs 16:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at University of Health Sciences Antigua shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Your University of Health Sciences Antigua edits
Xmandms, I have reverted your edits on University of Health Sciences Antigua because they violate multiple Wikipedia rules, particularly WP:NOR, WP:SYNTH, and WP:NPOV. Please address these issues in the discussion I have created at Talk:University of Health Sciences Antigua before making these edits again. Thank you. SGMD1 Talk/Contribs 17:38, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at University of Health Sciences Antigua. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. tedder (talk) 23:28, 20 August 2012 (UTC)