User talk:Xmxpro1

Nomination of Dr. Anna Frisch for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dr. Anna Frisch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dr. Anna Frisch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  00:04, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello, Xmxpro1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some links to pages that you might find helpful: • Getting started

• Introduction to Wikipedia

• Contributing to Wikipedia

• The five pillars of Wikipedia

• How to edit a page

• How to develop articles

• How to create your first article

• Simplified Manual of Style Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! – Wdchk (talk) 03:17, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the welcome and links. We are working in this page, it is hard to find time.  What is the deadline for us to get the proper data online?≈--Xmxpro1 (talk) 03:57, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * You can read more about the "Articles for deletion" process at Articles for deletion. Normally a discussion will remain open for at least seven days, but this can be more or less depending on the circumstances. While the discussion is open, you are perfectly entitled to continue to work on the article (as mentioned in the notice above). You have done the right thing by noting your intention on the discussion page. In my opinion, the most important thing you could provide would be reliable, third-party, secondary sources establishing the subject's notability (as I mentioned on the discussion page). If you need more time, one possible outcome is for the article to be "userfied", or moved to your user space, so you can continue to work on it. An administrator can do this on request even after deletion, so if the article gets deleted unexpectedly, please don't panic. The article as it stands needs improvement in areas like grammar and formatting, but to be clear: none of that would be grounds for deletion and those kinds of things can easily be fixed later. Sources demonstrating notability is the key thing in this case. – Wdchk (talk) 05:05, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=619130430 your edit] to Dr. Anna Frisch may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:05, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * | residence= Wellington, Florida|Palm Beach County

August 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Dr. Anna Frisch, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 14:51, 4 August 2014 (UTC) Dougweller I do not understand, what edits are you making ref. to?Xmxpro1 (talk) 14:55, 4 August 2014 (UTC)


 * You added claims to some student awards - these would need to be sourced to the awarding body (as should all awards). That's the only way that we can verify they are real. The other issue though is that awards should obviously be notable - we have criteria for notability but basically it means they or the awarding body should have their own article. Dougweller (talk) 16:11, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

When adding links to material on external sites, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the websi te's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dougweller (talk) 18:04, 4 August 2014 (UTC) Dougweller How is someones own work a copyright violation?Xmxpro1 (talk) 19:31, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry, are you saying you are Dr. Frisch? Dougweller (talk) 19:47, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

No, I am not Dr. Anna Frisch I work in the same area as her though. Xmxpro1 (talk) 20:18, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * OK, I'm confused about whose work you are referring to. But Scribd seems to be holding a copyright document, not unusual for them but we can't link to it as they don't have the copyright. Dougweller (talk) 20:48, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

This page is being unfairly treated and ripped to shreds. I have searched other doctors with lower research and qualification and they are no where as documented as this page. Example It really makes me wonder the motives behind the attention and hell I (editor) have been put through on every whim and requests. Xmxpro1 (talk) 00:33, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The page was edited to put it in accordance with wikipedia policies, not "ripped to shreds". When editing wikipedia, please follow wikipedia rules. In particular, when asked about reference, please add a reference or remove the questioned information. Removal of citation tags is not allowed. Staszek Lem (talk) 01:55, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

why are there no pages and in particular the one I referenced prior regarding residence and nationality. How does one cite the nationality and residence without revealing personal information about the doctor? Xmxpro1 (talk) 02:07, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Anna Frisch, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Randykitty (talk) 08:18, 5 August 2014 (UTC)