User talk:Xose.vazquez

March 2018
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page NUMAlink has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 00:28, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vostok Europe


The article Vostok Europe has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable watch manufacturer, fails WP:NCORP"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Renata (talk) 00:52, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of mechanical keyboards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corsair ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_mechanical_keyboards check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_mechanical_keyboards?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Tomtom products


The article List of Tomtom products has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Wikipedia is WP:NOT a product directory; appears unsourced and none of these products appear independently notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 23:09, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Linking of Redhat OpenJDK to Adopt
The sense I get from Redhat's available downloads and migration guides is that they intend to support and develop RedHat OpenJDK on the server side. The windows clients they have available for download are restricted to "Development only" and intended for developers to use for writing against RHEL middleware (seemingly only provided to validate client and server differences from the Oracle OpenJDK implementation). That would indicate that intend to leave the client space to the Adopt OpenJDK project (which AdoptOpenJDK claims they sponsor and host). Thus, I would expect the linking to be as follows: RedHat OpenJDK for Linux -> RHEL Repository downloads RedHat OpenJDK for Windows -> https://developers.redhat.com/products/openjdk/download (for development only) AdoptOpenJDK -> https://adoptopenjdk.net/

But the RedHat OpenJDK is not the same as the AdoptOpenJDK implementation - so the link from the RedHat OpenJDK for windows to AdoptOpenJDK seems incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeremyh3 (talk • contribs) 21:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

February 2020
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to BS2000 does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Oneiros (talk) 17:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

References vs articles to support a claim
You've been around a long time, so I thought I'd drop you a line to explain why I reverted one of your edits to Dive computer. The Manufacturers section has a maintenance template requesting more citations, so it's probably not a good idea to remove one of them. I do understand that most of the time, when we mention a company, we don't externally link to their website, and simply link to their article when it exists. However, that is to allow a reader to find out more about the company if they wish. That's a different concept from supplying a reference to support a claim. In the case where I reverted you, the reference was supporting the claim that HeinrichsWeikamp manufactures dive computers. Their own webpage is not an ideal source, of course, but generally we accept information that companies provide about themselves, as long as it's not unduly promotional or self-serving. The conditions for using a self-published source are laid out at WP:ABOUTSELF. Hope that helps. --RexxS (talk) 23:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Comparison of TFTP software moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Comparison of TFTP software, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 23:54, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Comparison of TFTP software (August 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jackmcbarn was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Comparison of TFTP software and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Comparison of TFTP software, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Comparison_of_TFTP_software Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jackmcbarn&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Comparison_of_TFTP_software reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:24, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

PROD
Hey, I just wanted to say that I deprodded Draft:Comparison of TFTP software because proposed deletion is only for articles and files. If you want your draft to be deleted, just use  and it’ll be deleted. Thanks! Maka (talk · contribs) 01:23, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Vendor links


Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:56, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Your recent editing history at CentOS shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Carlwgeorge (talk) 04:31, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Edit warring complaint
Please see the result of a recent complaint about you at the edit warring noticeboard. My only action is to remind you to observe Wikipedia's guideline at WP:TALK which describes the correct usage of talk pages: Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) New posts are supposed to go at the *bottom*, so I had to undo your rearrangement.
 * 2) There is no justification for removing others' posts unless they are vandalism.
 * 3) Also, please be sure to WP:SIGN your own posts on talk.

March 2021
Your edit to Sendmail has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:22, 24 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Why are you removing a full section? Do you understand what you are doing? They are many similar texts in the wiki, for example: BSD licenses — Xose.vazquez (talk) 23:34, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, I'm DaxServer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to IBM Global Services have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia.   -- DaxServer (talk) 17:54, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Releases Red Hat Linux
Template:Releases Red Hat Linux has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:12, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:X86-ABI
Template:X86-ABI has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:39, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Releases openSUSE
Template:Releases openSUSE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:16, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Mlmmj moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Mlmmj. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.  Just ' i ' yaya  11:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * I don't see how the subject is notable. If you think I'm wrong, please ping me.  Just ' i ' yaya  11:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mlmmj (March 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Funnyfarmofdoom was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mlmmj and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Mlmmj Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Funnyfarmofdoom&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mlmmj reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 15:22, 10 March 2024 (UTC)