User talk:Xover23

A tag has been placed on On One, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Black Harry 05:03, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to Kirk Morrison:
Your recent edit to Kirk Morrison (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits (like "TEST" or example.jpg), vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 23:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Jeepday (talk) 01:09, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Havenscourt, Oakland, California
fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: Not notable --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Twomps (Murder Dubbs), Oakland California
Twomps (Murder Dubbs), Oakland California, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Twomps (Murder Dubbs), Oakland California satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Twomps (Murder Dubbs), Oakland California and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Twomps (Murder Dubbs), Oakland California during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chris! c t 06:47, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Lockwood Gardens, Oakland, California
Lockwood Gardens, Oakland, California, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Lockwood Gardens, Oakland, California satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Lockwood Gardens, Oakland, California and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Lockwood Gardens, Oakland, California during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chris! c t 06:51, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Keak.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Keak.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Your edit summaries
Just a small note about the edit summaries you give when editing articles about Oakland: do you think you could be a bit more descriptive with them? And I'm curious what you mean when you say "adding to the [xxx] summary" as you invariably do; what does that even mean? You're editing the article, not a summary of it. Anyhow. +ILike2BeAnonymous (talk) 22:24, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Cypress Village, Oakland, California
An article that you have been involved in editing, Cypress Village, Oakland, California, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Cypress Village, Oakland, California. Thank you. Icamepica (talk) 03:56, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Campbell Village Court, Oakland, California
An article that you have been involved in editing, Campbell Village Court, Oakland, California, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Campbell Village Court, Oakland, California. Thank you. Icamepica (talk) 07:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Acorn, Oakland, California
An article that you have been involved in editing, Acorn, Oakland, California, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Acorn, Oakland, California. Thank you. Icamepica (talk) 07:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Dogtown, Oakland, California
An article that you have been involved in editing, Dogtown, Oakland, California, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Dogtown, Oakland, California. Thank you. Icamepica (talk) 07:48, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sobrante Park, Oakland, California
An editor has nominated Sobrante Park, Oakland, California, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Campbell Village Court, Oakland, California
Another editor has added the  template to the article Campbell Village Court, Oakland, California, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 10:59, 4 April 2008 (UTC)