User talk:Xox21

May 2013
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Pheu Thai Party because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 10:14, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pheu Thai Party. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 21:54, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pheu Thai Party, you may be blocked from editing. --RJFF (talk) 11:35, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Template blanking
Hey Xox - I noticed you blanked Template:Television in Thailand, which you also happened to create. Curious, was this a mistake, or was there a reason for blanking it? I've since undone your edit, as the previous revision of the template seems fine. Thanks, ~Super Hamster  Talk Contribs 04:31, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of water parks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chonburi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

February 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=645279400 your edit] to Kansai International Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:54, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * | footnotes = Statistics from New Kansai International Airport Company, Ltd.

July 2015
Hello, I'm ScrapIronIV. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Royal Thai Army, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Scr ★ pIron IV 14:21, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

September 2016
Your recent editing history at Republic of China Air Force shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BilCat (talk) 03:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Warning
Hello Xox21 you are clearly being disruptive with your infobox changes from Taiwan (ROC) to ROC, you have been reverted multiple times with a clear explanation of why a number of editors disagree with you. If you have an issue then please raise it on the related talk page, whatever the merits of your change disruptive editing will not be tolerated and you will be blocked if you do it again, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 11:29, 8 October 2016 (UTC)