User talk:Xpendersx

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Xpendersx! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 23 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:


 * 1) Corey Simon -
 * 2) Gerard Warren -
 * 3) Ronde Barber -
 * 4) Duce Staley -
 * 5) Joey Browner -
 * 6) Henry Ellard -
 * 7) Robert Brooks -
 * 8) Steve McMichael -
 * 9) Keith Byars -
 * 10) Buddy Ryan -

11. Norv Turner 12. Larry Centers 13. Sal the Stockbroker 14. Bruce Jackson (Project on Transitional Democracies) 15. Nate Newton 16. Ozzie Newsome 17. Julius Jones 18. Mark Campbell 19. Tom Donahoe 20. Louis Lipps 21. Drew Hill 22. Rod Rust 23. Tom Modrak

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ray Cappo


The article Ray Cappo has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unable to find reliable sources of information about Cappo. All the ones I can find are about the bands rather than him. This article has been unsourced for almost 3 years.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 18:15, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Reuel Marc Gerecht for deletion
The article Reuel Marc Gerecht is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Reuel Marc Gerecht until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:41, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Jimmy Bower for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jimmy Bower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jimmy Bower until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Girth Summit  (blether) 21:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Byron Brown
Byron Brown has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:35, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of One Life Crew for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article One Life Crew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/One Life Crew until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Woodroar (talk) 16:02, 29 October 2023 (UTC)