User talk:Xposurepro

December 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Versa geek  21:58, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Yngvadottir (talk) 18:13, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Manual of Style

Hi, Xposurepro; I see someone already raised the issue in 2008 of your adding external links to articles that go to a site with which yoiur user name suggests you are affiliated. I regret that you weren't welcomed back then with links to our policies to set in context why this is generally frowned upon. I recommend you have a look at the general guidelines and philosophy of Wikipedia as linked there, as well as the specific policies and guidelines on spam and conflict of interest. After looking at the links you added today, I've reverted all but one of them - in that case the article already included some "how-to" links, so yours seemed to fit in. In the other cases, though, your link(s) departed from the style of the article and our general policy of not being a how-to guide. You may want to discuss on the talk page of the specific articles, because it's possible that the links light be appropriate in some of those articles; but I'd suggest you don't simply re-add them, and especially not to the References section, which is for the resources that were used in writing the article. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:13, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rule of thirds. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 22:27, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Digital Negative, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 22:28, 16 July 2012 (UTC)