User talk:Xtiangunther

Welcome!
Hello, Xtiangunther, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Seattle has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Ibadibam (talk) 19:42, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Repeating problematic edits without comment
Hi again. I noticed you without addressing the issue I raised, or even providing an edit summary to explain what you were doing. Please keep the following in mind: I have found a source that supports your edits and added it to the article. Next time, please locate such source and add it to the article at the same time you make your other edits. See Citing sources for information on creating citations. Thanks for you contributions, and happy editing! Ibadibam (talk) 20:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Wikipedia depends on citations of reliable sources to maintain its verifiability. If you change content that is supported by a source, as you did at Seattle, you must provide a new source to support that change.
 * 2) Everyone should always leave an edit summary to explain their edits to other editors. Edits made without a summary are sometimes assumed to be vandalism.
 * 3) Repeating edits after another editor has reverted them is considered unconstructive, and some editors respond very angrily to such activity. Please see the essay BOLD, revert, discuss cycle and the policy Edit warring.