User talk:Xtifr/Archive 2

TfD nomination of Template:GW characters
Template:GW characters has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. -- The JPS talk to me  17:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Veronica Afflerbach
Hey, I think you're a decent guy and that, but I think you made the wrong decision on it. If you look how I've explained it, and the person underneath you're one, you'll see why it should stay, and I haven't been able to describe it the way I think it (it ain't easy), which is in the nature of it has to stay! Please change your mind, because a lot of good history and a good article will be badly and wrongly and unfarily lost! Please think carefully, it'd be a waste, and an article that should be there might go because of the foolish thing recently. Come on man, you seem clever aswell, which means that hopefully, at least, the sense you have should prevail. I look forward to you doing the right decision of wanting it to stay, I hope you realise this and do it.
 * MAZITO - Saturday, 6 January, 2007; 20:45 (GMT)

Sophie Delisio
Just so you know - people in Australia are more likely to know the ?charming? ?cute? little girl who was the tragic victim of not one, but two life-threatening car crashes - the first into a childcare centre, the second at a road crossing while under the care of a nurse or something - than her dad. Fact is, we're fairly unlikely to remember who was 2006 father of the year, which was awarded I think in January, by March or so. (a bit like, who the hell was Bindi Irwin before her dad died, and can you name her brother without looking it up?)Garrie 14:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Straw poll
Please take a look at WP:MALL to which you have contributed, with respect to proposals to merge it with WP:LOCAL, to continue developing it, or to go ahead and implement it as a guideline. Thanks. Edison 21:12, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Suggest you reconsider
this. You folks were sniffing up the wrong tree. Best regards // Fra nkB 01:15, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

thanks
thanks for help. im a wikipedia noob. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thomaslikespigs (talk • contribs) 22:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC).

Please take another look at Winfield High School article
Hi Christopher,

I've just substantially improved the Winfield High School (West Virginia) article. It may now meet your objections. Please take another look and reconsider your opinion at Articles for deletion/Winfield High School (West Virginia). Best, Noroton 20:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Helping out with the Unassessed Wikipedia Biographies
Seeing that you are an active member of the WikiBiography Project, I was wondering if you would help lend a hand in helping us clear out the amount of [unassessed articles] tagged with. Many of them are of stub and start class, but a few are of B or A caliber. Getting a simple assessment rating can help us start moving many of these biographies to a higher quality article. Thank you! --Ozgod 23:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikiproject Biography March 2007 Newsletter
The March 2007 issue of the Biography WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Mocko13 22:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

BTAT
Hey there,

are you still working on moving the list of bands... to a category? I'd love to help if you need the assistance. Let me know.

Searles2sels (PJ) 17:38, 11 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Sounds good. Is there a plan to mark those in the list that have been categorized, so that once they all are the category can be removed? Thanks for the info --Searles2sels (PJ) 14:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Undeletion request?
Hi. Sorry, wasn't sure of a better way to drop you a note and I didn't want to modify the "archived" talk page. I'd like to see my article undeleted because I was actually working on a couple others and was going to title them "ambulance companies in the Silicon Valley." While each individual company might not be a "company of noteable relevance," most of them are still family owned companies which can often be underrepresented in the Silicon Valley. Thanks!

Javastein

Reply
I have no idea why I did that (or what "TIA" means). Good catch. John Reaves (talk) 17:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Cookie
Thanks for the cookie. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 20:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello
I don't think we have that much in common: I'm a vi guy. :) Let's see: I was a diehard Debian user for about 5-6 years, but I made the jump to Ubuntu last summer. I threw Etch on a spare machine yesterday though (Thats my gnome screenshot at Debian). I think I'll be routing for the Ottawa Senators in the playoffs this year, but I doubt they'll go deep. My favorite fake band is Scrantonicity. Chad aka ccwaters 00:40, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Category:Complex systems
Thank you for your contribution to the complex system article in the past. Currently there is a Call for Deletion for the associated Category:Complex systems covering this interdisplinary scientific field. If you would like to contribute to the discussion, you would be very welcome. Please do this soon if possible since the discussion period is very short. Thank you for your interest if you can contribute. Regards, Jonathan Bowen 14:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Looking for input
Hello, you recently participated in this AfD. There is a discussion going on at the article's talk page about the title of the article, so I am notifying everyone who voted or commented on the AfD in case you wanted to participate in the discussion. Thanks! Tufflaw 00:56, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

The WikiProject Biography Newsletter: Issue II - April 2007
The April 2007 issue of the WikiProject Biography newsletter has been published.You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. BetacommandBot 20:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Hammond organist cat debate
Hi,

Thanks for your comments at WP:PipeOrgan, they are very valuable. I've replied to your points there - can we sort this mess out? –MDCollins (talk) 13:02, 25 April 2007 (UTC)


 * My thanks for your help with this one as well. The CfD discussion is now looking nice and harmonious as a result of our discussions. I'm having fun categorizing musicians in other trees that aren't fully formed, so I'll know who to ask if I can't think of the apt genre description for someone.  (There were a couple in Category:American harpists that I gave up on, plus I still have two in Category:Welsh musicians that need some research to work out how exactly they qualify as musicians!  Best wishes, Bencherlite 14:35, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello! I closed the debate on Category:Hammond organ players, but since you've already created the list I haven't tagged the category. Can you let me know when the list is moved into mainspace? Many thanks! Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:55, 29 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the note. Cheers! Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:57, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Your comment
"I do notice that Simul8 (talk • contribs) has a fairly unusual edit history for a two-day-old account. Xtifr tälk 16:33, 25 April 2007 (UTC)"
 * I have about 300 edits as an anon IP so I'm not new, if that's what you mean.--Simul8 11:56, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Zappa genres
Thanks for your note on my talg page, and thanks for starting this discussion. I have left comment on the Zappa talk page. Cheers.--HJensen, talk 21:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Jewish/Celt
Hi Xtifr, I'd appreciate if you could have a look at my reply to you and rethink your stance. Celts IMO do have states, Ireland, Wales, Scotland and Brittany which all have their respective occupation categories. I consider Jews before the creation of Israel to be a stateless people- as the Kurds still are today and they do have their own categories at Category:Kurdish people. Regards Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 21:36, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

You showcase yourself to be ignorant
in terms of musical history by your insistence that the Peel Sessions artist classification is not important. It is important, and the category needed to stay, and I am very angry that you took it upon yourself to foist your lack of knowledge about the topic at hand via your vote to delete the category. The category was necessary and valid and needed to stay on Wikipedia for the site to be full in scope. Peel Sessions artists were by and large artists who were marked by a sense of innovation and musical experimentation, and the fact that you discounted that in favor of your chosen ignorance of the subject matter means that your vote, as well as the vote of the other individuals who chose to vote for deletion, was and is tainted. (Krushsister 04:44, 13 May 2007 (UTC))

Category:Christian illuminated manuscripts
You supported this name at this CfR. I was just curious if you could take a look at the current state of Category:Illuminated manuscripts in consideration of the newly named cat and the subcats, and see if any re-arranging is due (because there are 4 subcats of Illuminated manuscripts that could be considered "Christian illuminated manuscripts"). Also note that Category:Illuminated biblical manuscripts contains at least three articles for non-Christian manuscripts (but these articles are also included in Category:Jewish illuminated manuscripts). Anyway, the situation is rather confusing as it was, and now the recent name change only makes matters worse, so I was hoping you could shed some clarity on the situation. Thanks for your consideration!-Andrew c 04:01, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Kudos at WP:N
Thanks! --Kevin Murray 07:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Rappers
You are correct. I've fixed the closing. Please check on CFD/W if this is better. Cheers,  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  07:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Enderverse
That term wasn't made up at school one day...have you read First Meetings? The Tor edition's full title reads: "First Meetings in the Enderverse." That said, I'm glad that it's going down, and I will now have reason to move Jane (Enderverse), Bean (Enderverse), and Alai (Enderverse) back to their better titles. hbdragon88 22:15, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

RfD: Eestimaa Hertsogiriik
I have renominated the redirect for deletion. It was nominated before but since it was bundled with Estland, whose nomination I withdrew, the handling admin also cancelled the RfD early. You voted on the previous discussion; I would like you to know that I have copied your vote and comment from the previous discussion into Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 May 27.

Furthermore, you might be interested in knowing that I also renominated Eestimaa for deletion, and on the same basis. You did not vote the last time, but it is not unthinkable you might want to vote this time. Digwuren 20:17, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Help! How to modify to make it a list?
You'd posted a helpful suggestion to convert a category to a list (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_May_20#Category:Films_containing_graphic_female_rape), but not elaborated exactly how to do this. I'm fairly new, and maybe its just a newbie error, but could you point me in the right direction?

Discussion on eliminating Category:(Nationality) (instrument) by genre from the categorization guidelines
In case you're interested but miss the notices I have posted on various WikiProject pages, I have started a discussion here about whether we need the category level of Category:American pianists by genre, etc, and I would appreciate views being expressed (at that location, of course). My (possibly incomplete) list of categories that would be upmerged if the guidelines change as I suggest is here. I thought you might be interested. Yours, Bencherlite 23:56, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Funk categories
Hi. I think you may have created categories that are too specialized with your "funk" categories (Category:American funk drummers, Category:American funk singers). Look at the bands Muruga Booker, Jerome Brailey, and Dennis Chambers have played with. Describing them as "funk drummers" is inappropriate. They are drummers, and they were P-Funk members, but their careers have included many more genres than funk. Likewise, Jessica Cleaves sang with the Friends of Distinction; describing her as a funk singer is inappropriate.

I think these people, and some others you have moved to the specialized "funk" categories, should be moved to the broader "American" categories without genre (Category:American drummers, Category:American singers). Let's discuss. Thanks! — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 20:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I didn't realize that musicians could be included in several categories (funk drummers and jazz drummers). In that case, I'll add categories — including the funk categories — to bios where appropriate. And the Friends of Distinction... well, they were a pop-soul vocal group like The Fifth Dimension, whom you're probably too young to know. :-) — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 21:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Heavy metal keyboardists by nationality
I put it all back. When I was handling the new Category:Greek heavy metal keyboardists, I didn't think anyone would miss that layer, but I was clearly wrong. Many apologies. (By the way, Category:Heavy metal bass guitarists, Category:Heavy metal guitarists, and  Category:Heavy metal singers all don't have this level of specificity, so I encourage you to make those by nationality if you care about it.)--Mike Selinker 11:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)


 * On two related points, Xtifr: (1) I've replied to your last post in our MUSCAT discussion and will try and get a draft up later in the week (busy IRL this week); (2) your creation of WP:MUSCAT was a very, very useful idea and I now follow your lead in using it in my edit summary for all my new categories, all changes to existing categories and all recategorization of articles (by hand or through my AWB account). Thank you for it, and for the suggestion re edit summary.  Yours, Bencherlite 14:27, 3 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Further reply. Thanks for letting me know - my watchlist is very clogged at present, so you got my attention straight away when I logged in! Bencherlite 14:40, 4 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Heads up: WikiProject Musicians/Categorization/draft. Looking forward, I think, to hearing what you make of it! Regards, Bencherlite 23:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

I love how everyone totally understands me
"nom's claim that "every serious source uses 'ninja' as plural" was fully rebutted at CfD by reference to the Oxford and Webster's dictionaries, both of which list both forms as valid pluralizations."

1. I meant "serious source". Do you think dictionary is a serious source of knowledge on anything? I want to know how the AK-47 works, so I look to a dictionary? "Serious source" is for example a dedicated book, or a (serious) magazine article.

2. "both of which list both forms as valid pluralizations" - so WHY delete the CORRECT form "ninja"? Something I just asked to revert, to soemthing you just said was "valid". Look, it's Ninja in fiction, NOT Ninjas in fiction. It's Category:Historical ninja NOT Category:Historical ninjas.

"Wikipedia should probably work with the form used by the primary source of information on this topic."

That's it! NOT stupid or badly-translated movies like them did! Again, WHY this one need to stand out from the related categories? The people who did it are not experts - neither am I, but the experts just DON'T use word "ninjas". So much about (haha) "encyclopedia". --HanzoHattori 05:52, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Also, I think you should see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_May_27#Category:Fictional_ninja - it was just 13 days ago. --HanzoHattori 17:56, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Jazz musicians of New Orleans
Not to come off wrong here, but you can't be serious in stating that such a category qualifies as a trivial intersection. New Orleans' jazz permeates the entire culture of the area, and indeed it literally is the birthplace of jazz and continues to be one of the most important areas in the world concerning jazz music. This is not a category exclusively for those who were there in the early days. No, far from it. This is a category that seeks to demonstrate how large of an impact the area has had, and continues to have, on the evolution of jazz music. It would certainly seem to me this is one of those scenarios where such a category is anything but redundant. (Mind meal 03:07, 15 June 2007 (UTC))

Parsing of my comments
It seems that a few editors have been parsing though my comments on some recent AFDs. As there were 4 simultaneous AFDs, there was a great deal of cutting and pasting between them. Also, Calton has a habit of copying a phrase or sentence out of a larger context and replying to it bit by bit. At any rate, I'm not upset with you, and I take no issue with your comment, but did want to try to clear up that I did not say that pageant contestants were athletes (despite some editors inference to the contrary). My argument and explanation/clarification can best be seen here. I'm not going to blast this everywhere, as it seems that the matter is pretty much decided and I really don't want to open myself up to further dissection by certain other editors, but I did at least want to try to make a clarification to you. There is no need for you to respond, unless you choose to; as I've noted, I won't be taking this any further. --After Midnight 0001 17:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

request for comment
Richmond, California id like to make a request for comment in the 80 image section please. Cholga saYS THANKS!Cholga is a SUPERSTAR ¡Talk2Cholga! Sexy Contribs 01:01, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Pucho & His Latin Soul Brothers
Hey there. Per your comments on the deletion review, i just wanted to privately state to you that it was after all just a stub. The article was referenced, it stated who led the band and that Chick Corea was a member. I was in the process of adding many stubs at that time, and felt that would be enough for the moment to assert notability. It was, in my own reasoning, like me stating that The Doors was a band that was led by Jim Morrison, and included such and such members. I believe the article was deleted due to an inherint ignorance of jazz in general.(Mind meal 11:15, 25 June 2007 (UTC))

List of Historical figures portrayed by Shakespeare
Hi Xtifr,

I just wanted to thank you really quick for your work on listifying Category:Historical figures portrayed by Shakespeare. I was just about to get started with the list when I saw that you had already listified the category. I've taken the liberty to move the list from your userspace to preserve its editing history (due credit where credit is due ;). Thanks again. Cheers S up?

Jazz genre categorization
Hi there. I wanted to see if you envisioned something along the lines of what I have done at Category:Acid jazz musicians concerning proper categorization of everything. I think this may be what you were talking about, and I think it works terrific. (Mind meal 06:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC))


 * Since you have been the most knowledgable person I've met to date on categorization, I have a problem I've encountered that I'd like your assistance with if you have the time and inclination. Please see Deep Blue Organ Trio article which I started today, of which I cannot find a way to have Category:Jazz ensembles by genre become a default on the Category:Jazz ensembles page. Right now it is a mess, with Category:Ensembles by genre and Category:Jazz ensembles by genre showing up in the alphabetized list. Optimally I would like to create one by nationality, as well. I have not been able to find the relevant information on how to do this if there is not some sort of sort key already established before me. I hope all this makes sense, as I'm not even sure if I am using sort key correctly in reference to this. At any rate, if you could help I will be in your debt. (Mind meal 17:21, 27 June 2007 (UTC))

Re: Singers by style
Re: If I remember correctly, this was just because the categories already existed. Looking back, it was probably the wrong decision. I think changing it is a good idea.  B. Mearns * , KSC 13:10, 27 June 2007 (UTC)