User talk:Xtracks96/International Electronic Machines

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted because... --Xtracks96 (talk) 17:27, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

This company has numerous government research and development programs through the US Department of Defense, and the Department of Transportation. As a company, it is connected with many local organizations as well as with Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Please let me finish creating this page before deleting it so that i can add the appropriate links and external 'notable' creating links.

Xtracks96 (talk) 17:27, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

I also understand that this article should be in the sandbox and am working on moving it there now. Thank you

Xtracks96 (talk) 17:29, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

To the Admin that will be reviewing this page, please understand that once my account is old enough i will move this page to sandbox until i can complete it. Thanks!

Xtracks96 (talk) 19:44, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * If you are contesting you should make sure you follow the directions for doing so. It's unclear whether or not the company is such that the article could ultimate establish wp:notabiity, but right now the article certainly doesn't. (e.g suitable sources)    Also it reads like an advertisement.   IMO you should request userification of it while you work on it and learn your way around. North8000 (talk) 22:58, 22 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I deleted it as an obvious advertisement, but I will move it to your sandbox as requested, you will find it at User:Xtracks96/International Electronic Machines. Be aware that having government contracts does not make a firm notable. The notability has to be shown by references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases.  Additionally, an article will be considered as promotional if it has excessive product description.

As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of the organization wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know.  DGG ( talk ) 05:07, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Ditto. I might split hairs on the terminology just to clarify - that a relationship is not inherently a wp:COI, but where such interests prevail it is. North8000 (talk) 12:03, 23 June 2011 (UTC)