User talk:Xtrashizzle

July 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Akwa Akpa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Also on Ekpe and others. Drmies (talk) 04:07, 7 July 2012 (UTC) Welcome!

Hello, Xtrashizzle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! William Thweatt TalkContribs 04:32, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

POV edits
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Drmies (talk) 14:09, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * This commentary, besides a personal attack on my integrity, is nonsensical: I'm not Ibibio, and without Wikipedia I would have no clue as to what that means. What I am is an editor and an administrator who recognizes non-neutral edits, soapboxing commentary, and blanking of verified content, and I will have no problem blocking you permanently if you don't stop that kind of behavior. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:15, 7 July 2012 (UTC)