User talk:Xu388/sandbox

Hkim856 (talk) 14:30, 19 October 2018 (UTC) could you save your draft in your sandbox first? As you probably learn from the editing module, all writers are advised to work on their draft in the sandbox before moving it to Wikipedia page.

Minjung Shin's review
The format of this article looks great including intext-ciation with connected links. There are lots of information in your article but they are from few sources so I recommend you to use various sources. Also, including some representative pictures would improve quality of article. I can see some sections are divided into few categories, which is great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mshin940312 (talk • contribs) 22:38, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Travis' Peer Review
The article seems to be well put together: a good intro and a decent amount of content that seems to be diverse an non-biased. The sources were good, but you repeated the first source in your second and third citations so you do not have many overall; are there any more peer reviewed sources that could fit? You might even be able to use our K-pop book. Also, what about giving some examples of English phrase usage in songs. Possibly some correct and incorrect English usage examples. Tfs0 (talk) 05:18, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Yule Kang's Peer Review
It seems like you already had substantial resources to support the use of English phrases in K-Pop Music, which is great! However, I have a question for your references, how can you support the first paragraph with only one reference? Probably that's far less than enough. Moreover, I guess you need to fix the 4th and 5th citations at the bottom of the page, but overall you did a nice job!